Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: I'm Just Driving -- Halacha and Hashkafa!?

I urge you in all seriousness to listen and/or watch the shiur (available on TorahAnytime.org) entitled:  Driving Halacha & Hashkafa; given by R' Shraga Kallus. Doesn't sound so interesting? Let me motivate you.

Let's start back a few years ago, when R' Fuerst was still giving his Monday night shiurim to בעל הבתים/non-rabaim/regular Joes. We had just learned that one may not turn over a Jew to the government authorities if said authority would impose a harsher punishment than the Torah. To do so is a horrendous crime and the perpetrator is known as a מוֹסֵר and/or מַלשִׁין -- an informer. Klal Yisrael has suffered terribly  from informants throughout this long, bitter diaspora. So much so, that their deeds engendered the one addition to our shmone esrei prayer; an entire dedicated to their eradication.

Imagine our shock, therefore, when R' Fuerst further informed us that it is an obligation to call the police if you see a Jew speeding through our neighborhood and (essentially) ignoring stop signs. "They are putting lives are risk," the rabbi said. When you listen to the shiur from R' Kallus referenced above, you'll hear that R' Wolbe put it even stronger -- "A reckless driver has the status of a רוֹדֵף/pursuer."

Here's another way to think about it. A person with and AK-47 attack rifle has the potential to kill 30 people (with a standard magazine). A guy driving a car with even half a tank of gas? Lots and lots.

What does this all mean? As discussed an an earlier TftD (The Law of the Land is the Law...), simply doing something that could get you a ticket is probably not usually a violation of halacha. On the other hand, driving recklessly puts you in the category of a רוֹדֵף/pursuer. That is both a leniency and a stringency. The leniency, obviously, is that in good weather and light traffic, driving a few miles over the speed limit does not cross that line to רוֹדֵף/pursuer. However, the stringency is that even driving at 20 mph in a 40 mph zone when the conditions -- weather, traffic, pedestrians not being careful, etc -- can easily put you over that line. Worse, it is a judgement call -- both in halacha and in civil law.

How easy is it to slip across that line? I an an avid-ish bike rider. I am very careful with rules of the road. I want the cars to respect me, and so I ride my bicycle in a respectable fashion. Why not on the sidewalk? First, it isn't fair to the pedestrians. Second, it is a 50$ ticket (yes; really). There are times I will ride on the sidewalk for short, straight distances -- if there are no pedestrians and the vehicle traffic is making the roads unsafe for me. Why straight? Last night I was walking home from ma'ariv. On the sidewalk after having crossed at the light, after having waited for the walk signal. As I walked past a building on my way home, a guy on a bike came tearing around the corner of the building from the alley onto the sidewalk. Fortunately, I was able to stop short and avoid getting hit. I  believe he noticed me as he continued on his way; hard to tell. One thing is certain -- even though he surely thought there was little foot traffic at night and even though he was on a bicycle... he just as surely crossed that line to רוֹדֵף/pursuer. Had he hit me, he certainly would have gotten that 50$ ticket (assuming he stopped to make sure I was ok), and he certainly would have had an interesting Yom Kippur.

One more thing, a "Word to the Wise", if you will: when driving conditions are dicey and it would require שאלת חכם/asking your rav. This is absolutely, positively, not the right time to whip out your cell phone -- even with speed dial -- until you are safely parked out of harm's way. So maybe be stringent with yourself on this one until you do have a chance to call your rav. That line between "permissible, after the fact" and רוֹדֵף/pursuer is awfully thin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...