Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Remembering Ameleik Means to Live Up to Who You Are

There is one Torah reading for which there is universal consensus that it is Torah mandated:
זָכוֹר אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לְךָ עֲמָלֵק בַּדֶּרֶךְ בְּצֵאתְכֶם מִמִּצְרָיִם/Remember what Ameleik did to you on the way when you were leaving Mitzrayim.

There are six remembrances that almost all siddurim record as mandated to be remembered each and every day. Remembering Ameleik is among them.

Sounds like it must be pretty darn important to remember what Ameleik did to me. To me? You mean to the Jewish people, right? No, to me; to me, personally. True enough that the Torah sometimes uses second person singular to refer to a group. However, in that same verse where it says לְךָ/to you in second person singular, it also says בְּצֵאתְכֶם/when you -- in second person plural -- were leaving Mitzrayim. True enough that Ameleik wants nothing less than the annihilation of the Jewish people. True enough that Ameleik is not satisfied for a Jew to recant his religion.

None the less, this is most assuredly not a call for some sort of Orthodox Jewish version of Holocaust Remembrance Day. My proof?  To answer that, we need one more key bit of information: there are actually 10 remembrances that a Jew should express to remember each day. Among them is a directive to remember what Bilaam and Balak did to us. Bilaam and Balak also wanted to destroy the Jewish people. Bilaam and Balak were also not contend do have Jews recant; nothing but today annihilation would do. What happened when they tried? HaShem stepped is with a shockingly and unprecedented heavy hand. HaShem not only quashed their plans, He actually manipulated Bilaam to say and do things that Bilaam did not want to do. Chazal describe it is similar to putting a bit in the mouth of a donkey to force it to go where the driver wants. Apparently, then if HaShem wants to protect us from even the most maniacal, demonic plan of genocide, He simply stops it.

Why the difference in Divine response? I'll give you a simple analogy. If your four year old keeps wanting to touch that boiling pot that you keep warning him, "Hot!"... at some point, you let him touch it. You make certain that he can't be really damaged, but you let him touch it. Why? So he'll learn. Not to learn that he has to listen to you because you are his parent, but he has to learn to listen to you because you love him and are telling him about reality so he can live safely and thrive. Now let someone come after your kid with that same hot pot. "Oh, no you don't! You are not touching my kid! How dare you even think to!"

Bilaam and Balak attacked us. HaShem protected us. Amaleik was only able to attack those who had loosened their grip on Torah. This is something that each individual Jew is meant act on each and every moment of his life: You are a child of HaShem. No one and no thing can touch you. If you get hurt, it is because you have ignored the reality about which HaShem has warned you.

Remember Ameleik means to remember that you are true royalty: 'בנים אתם לה/you are the children of HaShem. Now live up to who you are.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק