Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Your House is a משל to Your Marriage, Your Marriage is a משל to Your Olam HaBah

Unsolicited advertisement: In case you have not noticed, there is a "wealth" (wholly inappropriate word) of inappropriate material available "free" (only cost is your time, in this world and the next).  Guard Your Eyes is an amazing website with a wealth (completely appropriate word) of resources.

I don't like the term "fulfilling one's mission in this world".  It sounds like our poor souls were sent into this world and given tasks to fulfill in order to prove ourselves worthy to reside with our Creator in His abode.  That's not Judaism; that's greek mythology: The Labors of Hercules.  The Torah/Jewish concept is that HaShem created us to live in eternal bliss and enjoyment.  We have additionally been given the opportunity to take some measure of ownership of our destiny and thereby elevate ourselves to actual partners in the Creation.

I recently heard two ideas that seem to me to be absolutely fundamental to achieving that exalted and laudable goal.  We live in a world with other people because HaShem desires not only individuals who are working to perfect themselves, but a community/nation whose national mission is perfection.  That nation is composed, of course, of all of those individuals building relationships with each other to achieve what no one individual can.  This can be as simple as two (or more) joining together to lift a box that is too heavy for any individual.  This can be as complex as two (not more), joining together to create another individual.

Here is the first idea: we as individuals have needs that can only be met with the help of others.  For someone like me, who is reasonably socially awkward, that is an ugly truth.  Not only is my success of failure dependent on others -- as when I can't do something alone.  But much more difficult is that my very life actually depends on me finding someone who wants to provide me what I am lacking.  This can be as simple as needing a computer at work; for which I need my manager to fill out a requisition.  This can be as complex as being married and needing intimacy.  I contrast those on purpose to make a point.  I shouldn't be more embarrassed/ashamed of needing intimacy than I am of needing a computer.  Moreover, if my boss doesn't see the need for me to have a computer, I need to work on explaining -- in a way he will understand -- why I do need it.  Neither yelling nor pouting nor incriminationing nor threatening will be very productive.  Need I say more?

The second idea: a relationship is like a house.  Something missing from the relationship is like something defective in the house.  Not having a big, new monitor is like not having a convenient waste basket in every room.  Ok, ok... I'll have to take extra time to walk to the waste bin in the garage, but it's livable and I can get my job done.  Missing something essential is like a big hole in the roof.  It is not a good idea to ignore a whole in the roof.  Even closing off the room that has the hole is not going to work for long.  After a few rains, the water will seep through the gaps in the walls to enter all areas of the house... I could end up with cockroaches in the kitchen.  Killing these cockroaches, while absolutely necessary, will also be a continuing source of frustration until you address the root problem: there's a hole in the roof.  If the problem isn't addressed, eventually the house will collapse.

I like this way of looking at relationships because it really focuses on dealing with the problems, and takes focus off fixing the other person in the relationship.  Why is that important?  (Besides the obvious, of course.)  Because each and every one of our relationships is given to us as a gift from our Creator to allow us to work on those dimensions of our soul that are not yet capable of fully enjoying the relationship that our Creator wants to have with us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...