Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Praying for the Return of Eliyahu ha'Navi on Motzei Shabbos

Today (that is, the day on which this was written, for those of you reading this in the future on the blog or after release of the forthcoming book...) is the 5th yahrtzeit of my father, יעקב בן יוסף/Jerry Allen; a"h, and I ask that the learning done as a result of this d'var torah should stand as a זכות לעילוי נשמתו/merit for the elevation of his eternal soul.

One of the fun things about learning the Dirshu edition of the Mishna Brura is that you'll pretty much see a little bit of every dimension of Jewish Law and philosophy; all within the "dalad amos" of the laws of daily living.  Not shocking, I suppose, but some of the connections still surprise me from time to time.  For example, I hadn't thought that learning the relatively dry and almost esoteric halachos of תחום/allowed territory would lead to a discussion of how far angels can travel on Shabbos and what day of the week the mashiach might come.  Even better (for my misnagid mind) is that it comes from three of the stars of "just the facts, ma'am, just the facts" poskim: Magein Avraham, Pri Chadach, and Chasam Sofer.

The Magein Avraham, in hilchos havdala (295:2), explains the custom to daven for Eliyahu HaNavi havdala; ie, to sing the famous song.  The issue, he explains, is that there is a machlokes about whether or not the laws of תחום/allowed territory apply to traveling above 10 t'fachim (about 40") above the ground.  Since Eliyahu would need to travel from outside the maximum allowed territory of 12 mil (approximately 3.4 miles), it is inappropriate for us to daven for Eliyahu to come on Shabbos.  I know you've heard it's because it would detract from our Shabbos observance to have to pack up and all that (I've heard that also); I'm just telling you what the Magein Avraham says.  The Pri Chadash explains that Eliyahu would be traveling from at least the first sky, which is 500 years away (again, don't shoot the messenger; that's how Chazal explain the distance).  We may not know how far 500 years is, says the Pri Chadash, but it is certainly more than 12 mil.  I personally want note that the Magein Avraham does not say that Eliyahu can't come on Shabbos; only that is it inappropriate for us to daven for him come on Shabbos because of this machlokes.

Now... the Chasam Sofer asks: Then how does a mohel daven at a Shabbos circumcision that Eliyahu should attend?  No problem, he answers:  You see, Eliyahu has two dimensions of existence; one as a heavenly being (read: angel), one as a human (who lives forever).  To announce the mashiach at the Temple Mount, he would have to travel as a human from Gan Eden to Yerushalyim.  Since he is traveling "dressed in a body", he needs to respect the laws of תחום/allowed territory; so we can't ask him to violate that in case we pasken like those who say travel is restricted even about 10 t'fachim.  On the other hand, when he comes to a bris, that is as a heavenly emissary and as such is not restricted by physical limitations.

Hamlet noted: There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, / Than are dreamt of in your philosophy [science].  Poor Hamlet and Horatio.  We don't have that problem; there are not more things in heaven and on earth than are discussed by even the most dry of our poskim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...