Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right, But Two Doubts Make it Permissible

I thought I'd let the whole brew-ha-ha (brouhaha; get it?  I slay me...) about my post-pesach beer trials and tribulations before bringing up a side point.  I said there that the beer was permitted because we have a ספק ספיקא/doubly inconclusive. Namely: (1) Maybe the malted barley was all bought after pesach; (2) even if it wasn't we can rely on ברירה/choice (since it is d'rabanan).  On that point, some cried, "Nay! 'Tis but a single doubt, though with two dependent parts."

The ספק ספיקא I presented was:  First, we have a ספק if the barley is from before Pesach at all, and since it is d'rabanan we apply the general rule of ספק דרבנן לקולא/in case of doubt on a Rabbinic prohibition, the halacha is to rule leniently.  Second, even if the barley is from before Pesach, we can rely on ברירה/choice and we can assume that the barley used to make my batch of beer came entirely after Pesach.  The nay-sayers claimed that I had really only one ספק; namely, was the barley used to make my beer from after Pesach or not.  I was encouraged to stand my ground (that is really was a ספק ספיקא) from the fact that when I had presented my case to the rabbi, he agreed.  Still... I had no proof.  I also had a סברה/line of reasoning to explain my position, but -- as the saying goes -- סברות are a dime a dozen.

Then I say the Mishna Brura explaining a לימוד זכות for those who didn't worry about חדש in Europe.  Says the Mishna Brura (489:10, sk 45): First, maybe the grain is from last year; and if you want to say it is from this year, maybe it took root before the omer.  (For a relevant review of the rules regarding חדש, see my last post on surrogate motherhood.) Hey!  That sounds just like my case!  With that Mishna Brura, I am completely incorrigible and so herewith present my סברה to explain both these examples.

Suppose you have a mixture of two foods, A and B.  A is definitely permissible and B is only permissible because of a ספק דרבנן.  One of the rules of ספק ספיקא is that you need to be able to say the ספקות in either order.  Here goes.  ברירה first: First you can use ברירה to say that the grain taken for my beer from the mixture came entirely from A (and is therefore permissible), and if you want to say it came from B also, then we can rely on ספק דרבנן לקולא.  Now ספק דרבנן לקולא first: First, B at worst is forbidden by rabbinic decree and ספק דרבנן לקולא; and even if you want to say that B is actually forbidden, then we can use ברירה to say that the grain taken for my beer from the mixture came entirely from A.

Here's another cool question: Can I serve my beer to you?  Am I allowed to rely on the leniencies because I had already bought it (so it is only permissible to me), or do the leniencies make the beer completely permissible?  Stop by and we'll discuss it over a beer or two.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...