Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Five Mistakes in Philosophy/Religion/Dogma That Knowing HaShem Is One Avoids

After explaining the reason that HaShem chose to reveal Himself to us via His One-ness, the Da'as T'vunos goes on to explain that there are five categories of mistakes that the false dogmas make.

First, there are two kinds of avoda zara.  The first category of avoda zara believes that there is a creator,but he is so exalted and transcendent that he doesn't have anything to do with this lower world.  Rather, he created lower powers and assigned them managerial roles.  These managers have complete control of their division, while their creator is off playing golf or living the life of a recluse in a penthouse suite eating banana nut or chocolate marshmallow ice cream; we'll call this the Howard Hughes model.

The second category of avoda zara sees the obvious contradiction between an all good creator and the evil we see in the world.  Hence it posits that there are two gods; one good and one evil.  It is their struggle with each other that results in all the churn in the world.  This is the good cop/bad cop model.

The third mistake is to believe that the creator designed the world with rules -- aka laws of physics -- that govern all actions in this world.  It is then up to us creatures to role the dice and move ourselves through the game of life.  Every action leads to a reaction; the fortunes of a man being the result of his decisions and deeds.  Of course, since everything is run by natural law, this view also believes in fate; ie, that man cannot affect the final outcome.  This, says the Ramchal, is the belief of the vast majority of people; it is the underlying belief of the Reform Jewish religion.  We'll call this the fickle finger of fate model.

The fourth mistaken philosophy believes that the world was created and the creator runs the world.  They even believe that he gave his law (written only, if you please) to the Jews.  Nebbich, though, that they used their free will to go against their father in heaven, so big daddy had to abandon the bad Jews.  One version holds that dad stood by idly while those bad Jews killed his only son to provide a path of salvation to the good goyim; you know, like the Crusaders.  Another version holds that daddy sent a new prophet with a new set of laws to the other good goyim; you know, like Al-Qeada.  I'll leave it up to you to figure out who believes this.

The final mistake is to recognize the creator and understand how he runs the world, but those who ascribe to this belief have chosen to rebel against their creator.  They co-opt those very spiritual powers that he created to run to use as weapons against him.  America created the atom bomb, but any terrorist can Google the plans and order the parts from Amazon.

HaShem's "One-ness", however, denies all of these.  HaShem doesn't need managers and there is certainly no competitor.  The laws of physics are not laws set in stone, but an appearance created by the way He runs His world; so too for the spiritual powers.  HaShem gave us free-will as a gift for good, not to use against us.  Even if we do make mistakes, HaShem is not bound even by the dictates of reward and punishment to abandon us; chas v'shalom.  He promised that we were His chosen and treasured nation forever; so that's it.

Hearken, O Israel; HaShem is our G-d; HaShem is One.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...