Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Five Mistakes in Philosophy/Religion/Dogma That Knowing HaShem Is One Avoids

After explaining the reason that HaShem chose to reveal Himself to us via His One-ness, the Da'as T'vunos goes on to explain that there are five categories of mistakes that the false dogmas make.

First, there are two kinds of avoda zara.  The first category of avoda zara believes that there is a creator,but he is so exalted and transcendent that he doesn't have anything to do with this lower world.  Rather, he created lower powers and assigned them managerial roles.  These managers have complete control of their division, while their creator is off playing golf or living the life of a recluse in a penthouse suite eating banana nut or chocolate marshmallow ice cream; we'll call this the Howard Hughes model.

The second category of avoda zara sees the obvious contradiction between an all good creator and the evil we see in the world.  Hence it posits that there are two gods; one good and one evil.  It is their struggle with each other that results in all the churn in the world.  This is the good cop/bad cop model.

The third mistake is to believe that the creator designed the world with rules -- aka laws of physics -- that govern all actions in this world.  It is then up to us creatures to role the dice and move ourselves through the game of life.  Every action leads to a reaction; the fortunes of a man being the result of his decisions and deeds.  Of course, since everything is run by natural law, this view also believes in fate; ie, that man cannot affect the final outcome.  This, says the Ramchal, is the belief of the vast majority of people; it is the underlying belief of the Reform Jewish religion.  We'll call this the fickle finger of fate model.

The fourth mistaken philosophy believes that the world was created and the creator runs the world.  They even believe that he gave his law (written only, if you please) to the Jews.  Nebbich, though, that they used their free will to go against their father in heaven, so big daddy had to abandon the bad Jews.  One version holds that dad stood by idly while those bad Jews killed his only son to provide a path of salvation to the good goyim; you know, like the Crusaders.  Another version holds that daddy sent a new prophet with a new set of laws to the other good goyim; you know, like Al-Qeada.  I'll leave it up to you to figure out who believes this.

The final mistake is to recognize the creator and understand how he runs the world, but those who ascribe to this belief have chosen to rebel against their creator.  They co-opt those very spiritual powers that he created to run to use as weapons against him.  America created the atom bomb, but any terrorist can Google the plans and order the parts from Amazon.

HaShem's "One-ness", however, denies all of these.  HaShem doesn't need managers and there is certainly no competitor.  The laws of physics are not laws set in stone, but an appearance created by the way He runs His world; so too for the spiritual powers.  HaShem gave us free-will as a gift for good, not to use against us.  Even if we do make mistakes, HaShem is not bound even by the dictates of reward and punishment to abandon us; chas v'shalom.  He promised that we were His chosen and treasured nation forever; so that's it.

Hearken, O Israel; HaShem is our G-d; HaShem is One.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...