Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Cost/Benefit vs K'fira

I sometimes feel sorry for my yeitzer hara.  I mean, he gets up every morning and sees one item on his to-do list: Entice Michael to sin.  Can you imagine a more boring job than that!?  Honestly, that's about as boring as a tic-tac-toe competition where he gets the first three moves.  So he plays with me sometimes, just to relieve the boredom.

Like this one: a driver in a 3/4 ton red pickup truck gets irritated seeing me riding a bike on "his" road.  So he lays on the horn as he roars past me and makes a point of just missing me.  But then I see him stopped at the intersection and my yeitzer hara whispers, "Just pull around him, park your bike right in front of his truck, go over to his window, tell him how much you miss having a radio on your bike, and thank him sincerely for his horn rendition.  What could go wrong?"  First of all, I have learned from bitter experience that the answer to "What could go wrong?" is the same as the answer the question of "What is your name?" that Yaakov Avinu asked the Sar shel Eisav.  Basically... anything you can imagine and more.  Secondly, though, I make a cost/benefit analysis.  True, the cost is high (that truck driver will cream me), but there is a tangible benefit... I'll feel soo clever and will get my revenge.  What saves me, however, is that cost will be incurred almost immediately after the benefit; just too little time to enjoy.

Chazal (Bava Kama 79b) ask why a robber (gazlan) gets off easier than a sneak thief (ganiv) in the case of stealing cows and sheep.  Where as the thief, who makes off with his booty in the dead of night, has to pay quintuple (cow) or quadruple (sheep); the robber, who steals at gun point, only has to pay the standard double.  The gemara answers that the robber gives equal respect to people and the Creator, but a thief treats people with more respect.

The Maharsha explains that the robber is making a simple cost/benefit analysis.  Everyone knows and has actually seen criminals brought to justice.  He reckons that the benefit of enjoying his ill gotten gains is worth whatever punishment he'll have to suffer later; at human and/or Divine hands.  He doesn't deny reward and punishment, nor does he deny that HaShem runs the world; the robber simply feels immediate gratification is a fair price for eventual punishment.  (He's wrong, by the way.)  The thief, on the other hand, is kofer b'ikar -- he completely denies that there is any higher power to which he has to answer.  As long as he doesn't get caught by the (human) police, then he feels that he has gotten away with it.  The Torah therefore gives the thief a harsher penalty.

You have a yeitzer hara and can't control desires when in certain situations?  That's bad.... very, very bad; but t'shuvah is a real possibility and hope springs eternal.  But a Jew who feels there is no Judge and no Justice... rachmana latzlan... he's probably not coming back.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...