Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: La-Omer/Ba-Omer; B'Tishrei/B'Nissan Nivra ha'Olam

Whether you count "ba'omer" (as I do) or "la'omer" (not as I do, but don't worry, it doesn't make me think any less of you), at some point you must have wondered what this "omer" thing is.  So I am here to tell you.  It a measure of volume, equal to approximately 2 quarts  (1.997782468 quarts dry US, for you fanatics).  In other words, every night you are counting, "Tonight is N days which is N%7 and N/7 days of the quarts."  Very spiritually uplifting, no?

Of course it doesn't mean any old quarts.  After all, this is at the very center or a fundamental machlokes with the Tzadukim concerning the veracity of the Torah Sh'b'al peh/Oral Law.  There were three places where the Tzadukim denied the veracity of the Oral Law -- Shabbos, T'fillin, and the Omer.  The Written Law says not to have a fire burning on Shabbos, the Oral Law says it really means not to kindle/change a burning fire on Shabbos.  The Written Law says t'fillin goes between your eyes, the Oral Law says it really means on top of your head.  The Written Law says to bring the korban omer on the day after Shabbos, the Oral Law says it really means the day after Chag haPesach.

So our Holy War against the Tzadukim -- and all others who would deny the Oral Law -- is waged behind three solid bulwarks.  T'fillin -- about which it says "l'ma'an t'hiye toras HaShem b'fi'cha"/in order that HaShem's Torah should be your constant thought, deed, and occupation.  Shabbos -- shomer shabbos is equivalent to shomer torah and mitzvos.  Omer -- two quarts of animal feed.

Really?  Yes; really.  As already noted when explaining the difference in meaning between ba-omer and la-omer, the korban omer is b'davka out of barley because HaShem was doing a chesed for us by allowing us to use the earlier ripening crop.  There is more, though.  The Ramban says that the korban omer is chameitz free because chameitz represents midas ha-din.  The shtei ha'lechem, on the other hand, contains chmeitz.  Just as midas ha'rachamim preceeded midas ha'din in the creation of the world, so to with the omer and shtei ha'lechem.  HaMeivin Yavin (I love when the Ramban says that.)

So the omer allows us to eat chadash; HaShem doing a chesed for us.  The shtei ha'lechem allows us to bring our korbanos from chadash; us responding to HaShem's chesed.  The K'dushas Leivi (elsewhere) says that the machlokes R' Eliezer and R' Yehushua (Rosh HaShanna 11a): b'Nissan nivra ha'olam o b'Tishrei nivra ha'olam -- discussing whether the world was created in Nissan or Tishrei is precisely on this point.  If you say the world achieves its purpose by providing a creature who can accept HaShem's goodness, then b'Tishrei nivra ha'olam.  But if you say that the world achieves its purpose when the creature responds to HaShem's goodness, then b'Nissan nivra ha'olam.  "ba-omer" means during the omer period, ie, including the shtei ha'lechem because the korban omer is only complete when we can respond by bringing korbanos from chadash.  "la-omer" means the korban omer itself, ie, the omer is already complete because it allows us to eat chadash.

You can't really still think that any detail in halacha, no matter how minute, is just a "happening" can you?!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...