Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Love of Torah as Path to Love of HaShem and Beyond

I once had a conversation with a born-again/evangelical xtian that really touched a nerve.  Usually they just spout so much claptrap and drivel that it's not worth the breath or time to respond.  (Actually, I often take great pleasure in getting their veins to pop... but that's another story.)  What did she say that stopped me in my tracks?  "You just like Orthodox Judaism because its so intellectually stimulating!"  Of course Orthodox Judaism is intellectually stimulating and of course I love that about it.  So far so good.  What took the wind out of my sails was that little word, "just".  I had made a leap of faith to Orthodox Judaism precisely because of its intellectual honest.  I have, in fact, often described my conversion to Orthodoxy as a natural progression in my search for Truth.  Just as I had turned away from other science to physics and then away from other branches of physics to General Relativity, so to I had turned from physics to Orthodox Judaism.

And what's wrong with that, you are still wondering?  I'll tell you what's wrong with that.  Do you see the word "G-d" or anything about divinity at all in the above?  I have always had this nagging doubt that I had turned Truth into just another avoda zara.  I know all about mitzvos and halacha and philosophy and mussar; and I love learning all about those.  But there is this mitzvah to love G-d, you see.  I have read all about it; I can describe it, all its halachos, and all of its ramifications with the best of them.  One thing I can't do.  Feel it.  When I was charged with loving Orthodox Judaism just because of its intellectual depth...  I heard "j'accuse" and a voice deep inside with deep embarrassment, "Guilty, as charged."

Then last night, while learning Michtav mei'Eliyahu, vol 2, pg 27, "Geder Luchos haShn'i'im", I was given the gift of life.  I cannot do justice to the ma'amer here, but I urge you to learn it inside; it's only about one page, a few paragraphs, but it's life altering.  The message was the the first luchos were entirely from HaShem; meaning that only a person who had already rid himself of worldly passions could accept Torah.  The second luchos were hewn by Moshe Rabeinu and written by HaShem; meaning that you work with what you've got, and the acceptance of Torah will change you.  Whereas learning lishma before the cheit ha'eigel meant loving HaShem and therefore loving his Torah, the situation after the cheit changed.  "bara yeitzer hara, bara torah tavlan" -- HaShem created the yeitzer hara and He created Torah as its antidote.  Learning lishma now means learning Torah because you love Torah; but then very Torah will also cure you of the yeitzer hara; so that you will then come to love HaShem.

The fact that I haven't gotten there yet, says R' Dessler, is because I need to put more effort into my learning to increase both the intensity and depth of my investigations.  Oh; is that all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...