Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: On Being Chosen

There were two brachos that have given me a bit of grief over the years.  One is, "shelo asani goy"/"who didn't make me a goy."  The other is "asher bachar banu mi'kol ha'amim"/"who chose us from all of the nations."  The former gave me grief because, well, apparently He did make me a goy!  There are several answers to that, but there are also poskim who say a ger should not make that bracha.  We pasken that a ger should make that bracha, but I have asked the shaliach tzibor to be sure he has in mind to motzi me; always good to be yotzei all shitos.  (I also am nervous about being motzi another Jew in that bracha, though I have been told it is fine.)

You might be wondering what's to worry about with the bracha of "asher bachar banu".  The problem here is simply, why should I care if He chose this nation or the other?  I wasn't chosen anyway, so who ever He chose I would be joining.  Yet, I have seen no one discuss that issue at all.  I am not quite arrogant enough to believe that I am just smarter and deeper than anyone else whose ever converted (almost, mind you, just not quite).  So I am forced to consider that possibility that I am looking at it all wrong.  As it turns out, I am now pretty confident that it is not only possible, but I have strong evidence that my nervousness was completely misplaced.

The is an eye opening Ohr Chaim on the verse in Mishpatim: don't aggravate and don't oppress a ger, because you were gerim in eretz mitrayim.  What do you think?  If the Jews hadn't been gerim in mitzrayim it would be perfectly acceptable to aggravate and oppress gerim?!?  Actually, no; but that's not far off says the Ohr Chaim.  The Jewish neshama is a notch up in the neshama scale from a goy's neshama.  So much so, that the level up bein adam l'chaveiro demanded between two Jews is not demanded at all between a Jew and a goy.  Not that you can go around aggravating and oppressing anyone at all, but there is an extreme sensitivity required when dealing with a fellow Jew because of his refined neshama.  So, says the Ohr Chaim haKodesh, you might think that since the ger began his life as a goy, then his neshama is from the lower, less refined neshamos.  Therefore the Torah comes to announce: Just at your neshamos were in the tuma of Mitzrayim, so was the ger's neshama in the tuma of the umos ha'olam.  Just as HaShem elevated your intrinsically more refined neshama from that defiled environment; so too, HaShem elevated the ger's intrinsically more refined neshama from its defiled environment.

It comes out, then, that "bachar banu mikol ha'amim" should not be read as "who chose [our nation] from all the nations", but "who chose [each one of us] from amongst the nations".  Each individual neshama chosen specifically to be included in the Jewish nation.  Each and every Jew hand picked by the Author of reality Himself.  Wow/Cool/Yikes!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק