Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: M'chadeish B'chol Yom Ma'aseh B'reishis

People love to say, "minhag spelled backwards is gehinom."  Maybe, but all that means is that you better keep your minhagim in order.  Yet, Hillel was once asked how to handle a difficult situation and he answered, "I heard the halacha but I forgot it.  [Regarding what to do, however:] Leave it to klal yisrael; though they may not be prophets, they are descended from prophets!"  (P'sachim 66b)  So minhag certainly plays on important role in determining halacha.  In fact,
what?  But I am right in the middle of a TftD already.  Oh?  Wow; that is cool!  Ok then.
This just in; we interrupt today's planned TftD to bring you this very cool other idea that I just saw this morning.  (Yes, smart guy; sometimes these are planned.  Ahem.)

Everyone knows (from their earliest parsha sheets), that there is a machlokes about the meaning of  "chadash"/new in: "v'yakam melech chadash"/A new king arose (Sh'mos 1:8).  "Rav u'Shmuel; chad amar chadah mamash, v'chad amar sh'nischadshu g'zeirosav" -- Rav and Shmuel; one says actually new, one says that he innovated [evil] decrees.  Ok; seems to be a semi-interesting linguistic discussion about when do we use the word "new" when it comes to description of historical events.  Do we mean the source of the change was new, or the results were new?  More of a topic for Point/Counterpoint than Rav and Shmuel if you had asked me.  And why in the world tell us the disagreeing parties if we can't know who says what?

Comes the Toras Chaim on Eruvin (brought by the Halichos Shlomo) to tell us that this is not a matter of historical interest only.  It it, in fact, a machlokes about what the word "chadash"/new really means and how that relates to halacha.  For example, the Torah tells us that if someone has built a new house but not yet taken up residence, then he is exempt from some military service.  Does that mean literally new or simply significant renovations?  Same question for making the bracha of shehecheyanu on acquiring a new house; literally new or simply significant renovations?  Why do I care about who is involved in this discussion?  Because in a machlokes Rav and Shmuel we pasken like Rav for issur v'heter (ritual matters) and Shmuel for dinei mamanos (monetary disputes).  Not knowing who holds which side is going to play into how the p'sak is finally rendered.

Now to wax philosophical, one may contemplate how this affects our understanding of HaShem renewing the work of His creation each and every moment.  So much for a "simple" Rashi.

Minhagim and halacha?  Sure... soon... bli neder, im yirtzeh HaShem, b'ezras HaShem.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more