Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Brachos On Things You Could Have Seen Last Month, But Didn't

One is not allowed to benefit from the world without making a bracha.  One the pleasures of this world is experiencing feelings of awe.  Ipso facto, we have various brachos on seeing certain natural phenomena.  For example, on seeing the ocean (and some include the Mediterranean Sea), the bracha is (after following the standard recipe): sh'asah hayam hagadol.  Upon seeing a particularly high mountain, or a river whose course has never been changed, or (according to all opinions) the Mediterranean Sea, the bracha is: osei ma'asei b'reishis.  Humans being what they are, feelings of awe quickly subside, and so these brachos are only recited if it has been more than 30 days since the previous exposure to said phenomenon.

What is one lives near the sea/river/mountain and just hasn't seen it for a while (more than 30 days)?  The Halichos Shlomo says that one does not say the bracha again in that situation.  His s'vara is sort of a halichik catch 22: If you've seen in within 30 days, then of course you don't make another bracha.  If it's been more than 30 days then, since you could have gotten over to see it, apparently you are not sufficiently in awe of the sea/river/mountain to make the bracha.  Not being content with a simple s'vara (glatt though it may be), the Halichos Shlomo also bases his p'sak on an analogous p'sak of the Sha'arei T'shuva (O.Ch. 561 sk 2, bsheim shailos u'tshuvos radbaz; as brought in perek 23, d'var halacha 44) regarding tearing k'riya upon seeing the Kosel haMa'arivi.  Namely, that if one lives near the Kosel haMa'arivi but just hasn't seen in within 30 days, then he should not tear k'riya when he sees it again.  As usual, I am only reporting what the Sha'arei T'shuva said; if you are in this situation then you need to consult a rav (obviously).

The p'sak of the Sha'arei T'shuva is given more life by a of ma'aseh brought in the footnotes.  The Sha'arei T'shuva was approached by an individual in Yerushalayim who hadn't seen the Kosel haMa'arivi who hadn't seen it in over 30 days and wanted to know if he should tear k'riya (this is before the Sha'arei T'shuva was published; he was being asked as a rav).  The Sha'arei T'shuva told him one who asked the question (derech tochachah) that he should tear k'riya on the fact that he hadn't felt the loss of the Beis haMikdash deeply enough to visit the Kosel haMa'arivi (and therefore, since we don't do that, he shouldn't tear k'riya on going now).  Once he left, however, the Sha'arei T'shuva told his talmidim (who had witnessed this) that such a person was not worthy to being tearing k'riya at all!

B'ezras HaShem, the Beis haMikdash will be rebuilt soon and in our lifetime so these question will be nothing more than for historical interest.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק
Post a Comment
Read more