Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Kol Yisrael Areivim Zeh La'Zeh

There is one siman of the Shulchan Aruch that I found particularly frustrating for years.  As difficult as it has been to learn Hebrew well enough to learn, Aramaic has been even more challenging.  ArtScroll and Mesivata help out, translating and (more importantly!) punctuating the text.  When it comes to Shulchan Aruch, though, there isn't much available.  That's what makes siman 484 so challenging; the entire siman (all one siyef of it) is in Aramaic.  The siman is about how to run several s'darim in different houses, one after the other.  The main difficulty is that you can't eat after the afikomen, so the siman is mostly about how and which mitzvos and brachos you can make for other both before and after you yourself have fulfilled your own obligation.  Not for the faint of heart.  My guess is the m'chaber reasoned that if you didn't know Aramaic well enough to understand the instructions; don't do this.

Once you get passed the frustration, however, this siman is quite a nice application of both shomei'a k'ona and kol yisrael areivim zeh la'zeh -- all Jews are guarantors for one another.  We have discussed shomei'a k'ona before, but there is one detail we slid over: the shomei'a who answers can at most have the same level of mitzvah fulfillment as the ona.  An example is very helpful at this point.  Consider the obligation regarding m'gilas esther: a man is obligated to read the megila, whereas a woman's level of obligation is only to hear the m'gila.  That being the case, a man cannot fulfill his obligation vis a vis m'gilas esther by listening to woman read.

What about kiddush Friday night?  The man (according to most shitos) has already fulfilled his d'oraisah obligation of kiddush with his ma'ariv.  A woman, however, still has her d'oraisah obligation for kiddush; so how can he make kiddush for her?  Enter: kol yisrael areivim zeh la'zeh.  Just as a guarantor for a loan is on the hook as long as the borrower has not repaid his loan, so to we are all all on the hook as long as there is a Jew who has not fulfilled a torah obligation.  Hence, the man can make kiddush for his wife.  In fact, he can go around making kiddush in many houses and make kiddush time and time again.  Kol yisrael areivim zeh la'zeh gives him the obligation; shomei'a k'ona gives him the ability.

This shared responsibility came into being with the acceptance of the Torah, which makes for an interesting situation for gerim.  (In case you ever meet up with one...)  Some rishonim hold that when klal yisrael accepted responsibility for each other, it included all future geirim.  A second opinion is that only the original group (and their descendents) are included.  A third opinion holds that klal yisrael is not responsible for the mitzvah observance of gerim, but that part of the geirus process is to accept responsibility for the rest of klal yisrael.

Fortunately for geirim everywhere, we pasken like the first shita (whew!).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...