Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Kina, Ta'ava, and Kavod; Not Good

רבי אליעזר הקפר אומר, הקנאה והתאווה והכבוד, מוציאין את האדם מן העולם.
Jealosy, lust, and honor take a person out of the world. (Avos, 4:21)
At first glance, this mishna seems so straightforward that there shouldn't even be a Rashi on it; what, after all, is not self-evident about this mishna.  In fact, it almost seems like I don't need this mishna at all.  On second look, however, one has to wonder.... Taking a person out out the world (in fact, both this world and the coming world) is very strong wording about three things that aren't even actually issurim!  There are lots of things that I would have said are worse.  Rashi actually deals with this mishna in three ways.

First, Rashi just deals with why these three stick out.  On kina (jealousy), we have a pasuk in Mishlei 14:30: "jealousy rots bones".  For ta'ava (lust), we have a pasuk from Koheles 5:9: one who loves money is never satisfied with money.  The problem being that the ta'ava can never be fulfilled, so it becomes all consuming.  Rashi indicates that love of money is just an example ta'ava, but the same can be said about going after ones desires in general.  If the desire is leading the way, it can never be satisfied.  Finally, on kavod (honor/glory) we have a ma'amar Chazal, "positions of authority bury their officers" (Pesachim 87b).

Rashi, in his second explanation, deals with the phrase "es haAdam"; and understands it to mean that these three midos were the root cause of Adam haRishon losing Gan Eiden.  The jealousy and glory was from the the malachei hashareis who gave Adam haRishon great honor by roasting meat and preparing wine for him, and then in turn were jealous that he commanded such kavod.  The ta'ava was Adam's desire for the eitz ha'da'as tov v'ra.  Combined, they forced Adam's expulsion from Gan Eiden.  (Rashi gives no further explanation, but one may speculate that that the kina and kavod shown to Adam distorted his judgement and then the ta'ava was the knock out punch.)

Finally, Rashi puts these two explanations together and looks through history for examples of people losing both worlds (haze v'haba)  and traces their root cause to one of these three midos.  Korach was jealous of Moshe, Geichazi (Elisha's servant) lusted after Na'aman money, and Yeravam ben Navat could not tolerate the kavod of Beis Dovid.

It may be that Rashi's last explanation is designed to show how these very powerful midos, which were instrumental in removing Adam haRishon from Gan Eiden, continue to be a the root source of continuing misery.  Forewarned is forearmed.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more