Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Remembering Ameleik Means to Live Up to Who You Are

There is one Torah reading for which there is universal consensus that it is Torah mandated:
זָכוֹר אֵת אֲשֶׁר עָשָׂה לְךָ עֲמָלֵק בַּדֶּרֶךְ בְּצֵאתְכֶם מִמִּצְרָיִם/Remember what Ameleik did to you on the way when you were leaving Mitzrayim.

There are six remembrances that almost all siddurim record as mandated to be remembered each and every day. Remembering Ameleik is among them.

Sounds like it must be pretty darn important to remember what Ameleik did to me. To me? You mean to the Jewish people, right? No, to me; to me, personally. True enough that the Torah sometimes uses second person singular to refer to a group. However, in that same verse where it says לְךָ/to you in second person singular, it also says בְּצֵאתְכֶם/when you -- in second person plural -- were leaving Mitzrayim. True enough that Ameleik wants nothing less than the annihilation of the Jewish people. True enough that Ameleik is not satisfied for a Jew to recant his religion.

None the less, this is most assuredly not a call for some sort of Orthodox Jewish version of Holocaust Remembrance Day. My proof?  To answer that, we need one more key bit of information: there are actually 10 remembrances that a Jew should express to remember each day. Among them is a directive to remember what Bilaam and Balak did to us. Bilaam and Balak also wanted to destroy the Jewish people. Bilaam and Balak were also not contend do have Jews recant; nothing but today annihilation would do. What happened when they tried? HaShem stepped is with a shockingly and unprecedented heavy hand. HaShem not only quashed their plans, He actually manipulated Bilaam to say and do things that Bilaam did not want to do. Chazal describe it is similar to putting a bit in the mouth of a donkey to force it to go where the driver wants. Apparently, then if HaShem wants to protect us from even the most maniacal, demonic plan of genocide, He simply stops it.

Why the difference in Divine response? I'll give you a simple analogy. If your four year old keeps wanting to touch that boiling pot that you keep warning him, "Hot!"... at some point, you let him touch it. You make certain that he can't be really damaged, but you let him touch it. Why? So he'll learn. Not to learn that he has to listen to you because you are his parent, but he has to learn to listen to you because you love him and are telling him about reality so he can live safely and thrive. Now let someone come after your kid with that same hot pot. "Oh, no you don't! You are not touching my kid! How dare you even think to!"

Bilaam and Balak attacked us. HaShem protected us. Amaleik was only able to attack those who had loosened their grip on Torah. This is something that each individual Jew is meant act on each and every moment of his life: You are a child of HaShem. No one and no thing can touch you. If you get hurt, it is because you have ignored the reality about which HaShem has warned you.

Remember Ameleik means to remember that you are true royalty: 'בנים אתם לה/you are the children of HaShem. Now live up to who you are.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: David HaMelech's Five Stages of Finding HaShem In the World

Many of us "sing" (once you have heard what I call carrying a tune, you'll question how I can, in good conscience, use that verb, even with the quotation marks) Eishes Chayil before the Friday night Shabbos meal.  We feel like we are singing the praises of our wives.  In fact, I have also been to chasunas where the chasson proudly (sometimes even tearfully) sings Eishes Chayil to his new eishes chayil.  Beautiful.  Also wrong.  (The sentiments, of course, are not wrong; just a misunderstanding of the intent of the author of these exalted words.) Chazal (TB Brachos, 10a) tell us that when Sholmo HaMelech wrote the words "She opens her mouth Mwith wisdom; the torah of kindness is on her tongue", that he was referring to his father, Dovid HaMelech, who (I am continuing to quote Chazal here) lived in five worlds and sang a song of praise [to each].  It seems to me that "world" here means a perception of reality.  Four times Dovid had to readjust his perc