Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When ספק דרבנן לקולא Doesn't Work

ספק דרבנן לקולא does not mean, G-d Forbid, that we take Rabbinic decrees lightly, nor does it mean that ignorance can be covered up by saying, "oh well... I guess I am in doubt and ספק דרבנן לקולא, so let's go for it!"  However, when you have investigated the situation and are left with a real ספק on a דרבנן it is really, really the halacha that you go to the lenient side.  Moreover, regarding עירובים, in any machlokes in the gemara the halacha accord to the side being lenient.  I found it interesting and surprising, therefore, that there is a case with עירובי תחומין that leads to needing to be stringent on all sides.

I have already mentioned the following problem:
Here's a really cool problem:  Suppose someone mistakenly thought he could establish one תחום for Friday night and another for Shabbos day (he wants to hear two different shiurim on different sides of his תחום).  This is a mistake, so (at least) one of the עירובים is not effective; but which one?  ... Therefore he is stuck at home.
Hang on, there, quick's draw, since at least one eiruv is effective, let's be lenient and let him choose.  No and no.  The halacha is that we must apply both leniencies; one leniency says he can go to the east, the other to the west.  As in all cases where halachic demands pull in different directions, we need to take a position that steers clear of all conflict.  In this case, that leaves him only at home.  R' Akiva Eiger (who speaks that out) says this is different than the case where his עירוב might have been destroyed during twilight, where he gets to retains his planned תחום because of ספק דרבנן לקולא.  That is, we don't restrict him to stay in the subset of the תחום covered by both his home and his עירוב, which seems analogous to the our situation with the two עירובים in opposite directions.  In the case of the one עירוב that might have burned up, R' Eiger explains, he definitely took his mind off the side of the תחום from his house away from the עירוב; therefore losing that is not a stringency -- it is, rather the very leniency he was seeking from the beginning.

The Aruch HaShulchan has another insight into why he loses the תחום of his house in this case and compares it to a case where he placed his עירוב outside his תחום  (ie, more that 2000 cubits from his home).  In the case of the עירוב outside his תחום, the עירוב also can't be effective, but in that case he gets to keep his original תחום; why don't we say he lost that as above?  In the case of placing the עירוב outside his תחום, if we told him his mistake then he would certainly want to remain home.  On the other hand, if we told him he is mistaken to think he can have multiple עירובים for different epochs of his Shabbos, he has no one that clearly was intended to the exclusion of all others.

Bottom line: whether or not ספק דרבנן לקולא  is a good idea, it is the law.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…