Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Two Wrongs Don't Make A Right, But Two Doubts Make it Permissible

I thought I'd let the whole brew-ha-ha (brouhaha; get it?  I slay me...) about my post-pesach beer trials and tribulations before bringing up a side point.  I said there that the beer was permitted because we have a ספק ספיקא/doubly inconclusive. Namely: (1) Maybe the malted barley was all bought after pesach; (2) even if it wasn't we can rely on ברירה/choice (since it is d'rabanan).  On that point, some cried, "Nay! 'Tis but a single doubt, though with two dependent parts."

The ספק ספיקא I presented was:  First, we have a ספק if the barley is from before Pesach at all, and since it is d'rabanan we apply the general rule of ספק דרבנן לקולא/in case of doubt on a Rabbinic prohibition, the halacha is to rule leniently.  Second, even if the barley is from before Pesach, we can rely on ברירה/choice and we can assume that the barley used to make my batch of beer came entirely after Pesach.  The nay-sayers claimed that I had really only one ספק; namely, was the barley used to make my beer from after Pesach or not.  I was encouraged to stand my ground (that is really was a ספק ספיקא) from the fact that when I had presented my case to the rabbi, he agreed.  Still... I had no proof.  I also had a סברה/line of reasoning to explain my position, but -- as the saying goes -- סברות are a dime a dozen.

Then I say the Mishna Brura explaining a לימוד זכות for those who didn't worry about חדש in Europe.  Says the Mishna Brura (489:10, sk 45): First, maybe the grain is from last year; and if you want to say it is from this year, maybe it took root before the omer.  (For a relevant review of the rules regarding חדש, see my last post on surrogate motherhood.) Hey!  That sounds just like my case!  With that Mishna Brura, I am completely incorrigible and so herewith present my סברה to explain both these examples.

Suppose you have a mixture of two foods, A and B.  A is definitely permissible and B is only permissible because of a ספק דרבנן.  One of the rules of ספק ספיקא is that you need to be able to say the ספקות in either order.  Here goes.  ברירה first: First you can use ברירה to say that the grain taken for my beer from the mixture came entirely from A (and is therefore permissible), and if you want to say it came from B also, then we can rely on ספק דרבנן לקולא.  Now ספק דרבנן לקולא first: First, B at worst is forbidden by rabbinic decree and ספק דרבנן לקולא; and even if you want to say that B is actually forbidden, then we can use ברירה to say that the grain taken for my beer from the mixture came entirely from A.

Here's another cool question: Can I serve my beer to you?  Am I allowed to rely on the leniencies because I had already bought it (so it is only permissible to me), or do the leniencies make the beer completely permissible?  Stop by and we'll discuss it over a beer or two.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…