Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Main Part of a Bracha Is the Beginning

When I was first contemplating becoming Orthodox, way back in Dallas, started attending some adult education classes.  These classes were held in peoples' homes and always had food (cookies and what not); here's a good tip: if you want someone  to attend a meeting, offer them food.  I was a little shocked when I saw someone already frum pick up a cookie, mumble something under his breath, then eat the cookie.  What shocked me was that he was fully engaged in a conversation at the time; he was simply saying the words of the bracha as a sort of incantation before putting food in his mouth.  It just didn't seem like correct protocol for addressing the King.

After more than 20 years of contemplation, it still doesn't seem right.  Chazal (TB Brachos 12a) discuss the minimum requirement for saying a bracha "well enough"; ie, not correctly, but also not so bad as to require starting from scratch.  The gemara first notes that it is obvious that one who picks a cup of wine that he thinks is beer, and therefore begins his bracha planning to make a "she'ha'kol", but then finishes "borei pri ha'gafen", has obviously fulfilled his obligation.  After all, b'di'avad, a "she'ha'kol" works for anything.  However, what about the other way around?  He picks up a beer thinking it is wine, and therefore begins his bracha planning to make a "borei pri ha'gafen", but then finishes with a "she'ha'kol".  The gemara is so not sure what the halacha is in that case, that even after giving its best shot, the matter is left forever unresolved.

The gemara poses the question thus (as elucidated by Rashi and Tosofos):  When one's intention during the main part of the bracha -- that is: Baruch Atah, HaShem, Melech HaOlam -- contradicts what he actually says at the end, do we say the bracha is what he intended or what he actually said?  Let's say that a different way: the gemara seriously contemplates that your thoughts and intention during the main part of the bracha can override the words you actually say.

Since the gemara leaves the matter unresolved, the rishonim debate how we should pasken.  Tosofos brings two opinions: (1) the R'if who throws in the towel and defaults to "safeik brachos l'hakeil", so don't make another bracha. (2) the R"i disagrees and if your intention is wrong during the main part of the bracha, then you're done; you need to make a new bracha.  The Shulchan Aruch (OC 209:1) goes even further.  The m'chaber says that if you have a cup of beer or even water in your hand and intend to make a sh'ha'kol during the main part of the bracha (Baruch Atah HaShem, Elokeinu Melech HaOlam), then even if you end up saying the words "borei pri ha'gafen", you don't need to make a new bracha.  The Mishna Brura says that everyone argues and l'ma'aseh you would need to make another bracha.  Even so, the fact that there is a really position out there that your thoughts could override your words to the point that it would be considered a good bracha is just astounding.

You may want to think about that before you make your next bracha.  You might then want to think during your next bracha.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…