Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: How Connected Does a Patch Need to Be In Order to Be Considered Part of the Garment?

Another catchy title and topic brought to you by masechta Keilim.  I was a chubby kid, so  Mom bought my pants in the "husky" section (hated that word, by the way).  Husky sizes were more expensive, so she also bought them long; so the knees wore through my pants long before I outgrew them.  (Fat little boy in wide jeans with rolled up legs -- got the picture?)  Mom was not a top seamstress, but those were the days of iron on patches.  Mom even eventually learned to iron them on to the inside of the pant leg (just turn it inside out first), so it wasn't so embarrassing.  The patch I mean; they were still husky size with rolled up legs.  (She must have bought them really big, because I don't remember them ever wearing jeans with less that two inches of faded denim cuff showing.)

But imagine she had sown them, and that we had lived during the times of the Beis HaMikdash; and... oh yeah... that I had been Jewish.  When would that patch have been attached enough that the garment would become one as far as tuma goes?

Let's start where everyone agrees and then work our way to the fringes (28:7).  If the patch is only attached (by sewing; I don't think they had iron-on patches at the time of the mishna) on only one side in such a way that it does not cover the hole in normal use of the garment, then everyone agrees that the patch is not considered part and parcel of the garment.  That is, if the garment was from a dead guy, the patch remains tahor.  Likewise, if both garment and patch are tahor, then a rat curls up and dies on this patch, the garment remains tahor.  If two opposing sides of the patch are attached, then everyone agrees that the patch is now considered part of the garment; their lot is cast together with respect to t'hara and tuma.  Now the fun begins.

Suppose the patch is sewn along two adjoining edges.  -- Aside: the mishna calls this "like the Greek letter gamma (Γ). Why the sages chose to describe this situation with a Greek letter instead of the Hebrew dales (ד), I just don't know; but they did. -- In that case we have a machlokes (shocking, I know).  R' Akiva says that's good enough, the Sages say "nuh-uh" (in Aramaic, of course).

We aren't finished, though.  R' Yehuda says hang on here just one cotton picking minute!  When we said that one side is not good enough, that's only for a garment that has no direction; such as a shawl or scarf.  Why?  Because then the stitching of the patch might be sometimes on top (and therefore cover the hole) and sometimes on the bottom (and therefore the hole is there and open in front of the Good Lord and everybody).  If, however, we are talking about pants or a shirt, which can only be worn in one orientation, then stitched along the top is a good connection, but stitched along the bottom is as good as not sewn at all (more or less).

All this is for square patches.  How this works for rectangular, circular, and other odd shapes is left as an exercise for the interested reader.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…