Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Thoughtful Speech That Leads to Divine Service Is What Makes You Human

The mishna (Bava Kama 34b) uses a common pedagogical tool of listing contrasting cases to ease memorization: "There are cases where the action of a person's animal incurs a penalty, but the same action by the person himself is exempt from penalty; where the action of a person's animal is exempt from penalty, but the same action by the person himself  incurs a penalty;  Howso?"  A list of such scenarios is presented, ending with: if the ox ignites a hay stack on Shabbos, the owner must pay for damages, while if the person himself does so he is exempt from paying damages because he has incurred the death penalty.

The person is exempt due to the principle of "kam lei mi'd'raba minei"; Once he has transgressed a capital crime, he is exempt from paying monetary damages that were also incurred in his transgression; he's had a bad enough day without adding insult to injury.  The gemara, however, it taken aback by this p'sak.  From the wording of the mishna, it is clear that the actual crime (so to speak) is the same for the animal and the person; it is only the resulting punishment that differs.  The burning down of a hay stack is clearly a purely destructive act.  The m'lachos of Shabbos are learned from the building/running of the mishkan; an inherently constructive endeavor. Therefore m'lachos which are done in a purely destructive manner (ie, not even as preparation for a repair) are usually "patur aval assur"; exempt from punishment at the d'oraisa level, but forbidden mi'd'rabanan.  One amora actually suggests that burning something down (being an inherently destructive act) is different; R' Yochanon tells him: take that kind of talk outside of beis medrash.

How does R' Yochanon, though, understand our mishna?  No problem; the person must have burned the hay stack to produce ashes that he needed for something.  But... but... sputters the gemara... that would mean the ox also had a plan use the ashes!?!  Yep, replies R' Yochanon, he needed ashes to for a bite that was bothering him on his back.  What?!  The ox planned this out?  How do you know?  Simple... you see oxen rolling in ashes, so they planned it that way.  Besides, everyone knows about Rav Papa's cow who had a tooth ache and so broke into a barrel of beer to ease the pain.

So animals think and plan.  Animals communicate by making sounds.  So what, precisely, is the difference between man and animal?  It appears that if you are thinking, planning, and acting only to satisfy your physical and/or emotional needs, then you are not doing anything different than an animal.  The G"ra on Mishlei says in several different ways that a person's job in this world is to Think in Torah, Speak in Torah to do mitzvos, Perform mitzvos.  This three pronged approach combining Thought & Speech & Action is our purpose for being in this world and (as we see from the gemara in Bava Kama) the only thing that distinguishes as human; as Tzelem Elokim.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Battling the Evil Inclination on all Fronts

Yom Kippur.  When I was growing up, there were three annual events that marked the Jewish calendar: eating matzos on Passover, lighting candles on Chanuka, and  fasting on Yom Kippur.  Major news organizations around the world report on the "surreal" and "eerie" quiet of the streets in even the most secular neighborhoods of Israel.  Yom Kippur.

As you know, I am observant of Jewish law.  Some have even called me "ultra orthodox" (not in a kind way).  Given that, I have a question.  How likely do you think that I would be tempted to eat on Yom Kippur, that most holy day of the year?  Let's make the scale zero to ten, where zero is "as likely as driving through McDonald's on Shabbos and ordering a Big Mac with extra cheese." and ten is "as likely as breathing regularly".  Take your time.  If you answered "zero"; thank you, but -- sadly and penitently -- no.  The answer is more like nine; I'd like to say lower, but i…

Thought for the Day: Coming Into This World for Torah, Avodah, and Acts of Loving Kindness

This TftD is so self-serving that I should be embarrassed.  But I am not... talking about grandchildren is always off budget.  I have, bli ayin hara, a beautiful new grandson; born at 6:11 PM CDT last Friday night.  The secular (aka -- by me, anyway -- slave) date is October 20, 2017 CE.  The Hebrew (aka Real) date is certainly Rosh Chodesh חשון/Cheshvan and certainly in the year 5778 since Creation.  The date, you ask... good question!

Sundown on Friday night was 6:01 PM CDT, which means he was born either at the end of the last day of תשרי or the beginning of the first day of Cheshvan; a period know as בין השמשות/twilight.  What's the big deal, you ask... I am so glad you asked.  We all deal quite handily with בין השמשות every week and every holiday; we're just stringent.  We start Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov before בין השמשות; that is, before sundown.  Likewise, we end Shabbos and the first day of Yom Tov after בין השמשות; some 42, 50, 60, or 72 minutes after sundo…

Thought for the Day: Prayer II -- How?

Now that we know that the obligation to pray is nothing more (nor less!) than a divine decree, we are going to also need instructions from heaven on how to implement that decree.  I cannot stress enough how important it is to have instruction from heaven how to implement heavenly decrees.  One only needs to look at the shambles that one modern ism has made of the very important Torah principle of תיקון עולם/improving and fixing the world.  They have taken words out of context and used them to support their own nefarious schemes.  (To the point that Google Translate actually translates -- not transliterates -- תיקון עולם as Tikkun Olam.  Amelia Bedelia would be proud; we are not amused.

The Torah teaches us how to pray in two complementary fashions.  One is the way in which the concept is presented as an obligation, the other is by giving us examples of how to practically implement those instructions.

The obligation is introduced in the second paragraph of "sh'ma" -- וּלְ…