Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Emuna P'shuta Vs. Scientific Evidence

The little bit of scientist left in me that has not yet been beaten to a pulp gets its teeth set on edge by the expression, "It's only a theory."  Honestly, it's worse than fingernails on a chalk board (aka blackboard; an ancient reusable writing surface usually made of dark grey or black slate).  After years of suffering, I have developed a new way to explain what a theory is, and here is it's debut.  Scientist use three levels of models: conjecture, hypothesis, and theory.  A conjecture is the girl you met in the bar last night; she definitely looked better before you sobered up and saw her in the light of day.  Hypothesis: the girl you are serious enough to consider marriage, which makes you a little nervous and you are looking for flaws.  A theory is, of course, your wife; problems anyone sees is because of their misunderstanding and you are ready to defend her.  (See end for a G-Rated/Lakewood Cheder version of conjecture.)

Gravity, for example, is a theory.  String theory, despite its name, is a hypothesis.  It took relativity and quantum mechanics about 40 years to go from wild conjectures in the early 1900s to hypotheses, and then to theories after some seminal experiments were done.  The transitions occur on the basis of evidence.  Conjecture becomes hypothesis when enough experiments have been done to make everyone comfortable that here are no obvious errors.  The difference between a hypothesis and a theory is that one negative experiment can disprove a hypothesis, whereas negative experiments regarding theories generally cause us to reexamine either the experiment itself or re-interpret its results to fit our theory.

And there's the rub: the transition from hypothesis to theory is not really based on evidence; rather it requires a leap of faith.  This is not a problem with the methodology, just a fact of reality.  The strength of the scientific method is that is can easily disprove a hypothesis.  The weakness is that it can never prove a theory; it can give you more confidence that it is not false, but never provide proof.  As long as you require more proof, you are stuck at the hypothesis stage.

Noach, Eisav, and the Umos haOlam all base their belief in G-d on evidence of His goodness.  That's why HaShem had to finally shut the door to the teiva Himself before the rains flooded it.  That's why Yitzchak had to give a bracha to Eisav that promised him good regardless of his behavior.  That's why Shlomo ha'melech gave a similar bracha to the Umos haOlam on the dedication of the Beis HaMikdash.  For them, G-d is a working hypothesis as long as He keeps doing good.  One experiment of Him not doing good in their eyes is enough to send them searching for a better gig.

Avrham, Yitchak, Yaakov, and their descendants are "matzdik ha'din" -- look for ways to appreciate HaShem's behavior even when it doesn't feel good.  Both paths bring one closer to HaShem.  The path of the Umos HaOlam brings them closer like a donkey to the feeding trough.  The path of Klal Yisrael brings us closer together; as father and child, as husband and wife, as HaShem and His nation.

Due diligence:
G-Rated/Lakewood Cheder version of conjecture: The girl you saw across the hall at the chasuna last night; she looked much better all done up did and before you got the report from the shadchan.


Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…