Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: S'feik S'feika

Two wrongs do not make a right.  Three lefts, on the other hand, do make a right; and two Wrights make an airplane.  It also turns out that two doubts can make a bracha.

I really started this before "safeik brachos l'hakeil", but finally realized there was too much to cover in this venue.  The basic premise is that we are again dealing with the usual case of brachos that are d'rabanon and not shmone esrei.

A double doubt (s'feik s'feika) can act just like a certainty.  S'firas ha'omer, for example.  Suppose I can't remember if I counted yesterday.  If I am sure I didn't count, then I can no longer count with a bracha, though I still continue counting.  Now that I have a s'feik s'feika, I get to continue with a bracha.  The argument goes like this: First of all, maybe I really did count.  Secondly, even if I didn't count, maybe the halacha is like those who hold that the counting of each day is a mitzvah in and of itself (and not only if part of a complete counting of all 49 days).

However, s'feik s'feika really is not handled the same way as a certainty.  For example, suppose one eats a complete fruit (such as a grape) that is so big it might be a whole k'zayis by itself.  You might think you can make a bracha acharona because: First of all, maybe the halacha is to make a bracha acharona after eating a complete fruit.  Secondly, even if that isn't the halacha, maybe it was a k'zayis and so would anyway require a bracha acharona.  But you don't.  Once there is any kind of doubt about whether or not to make a bracha acharona, the usual rule of "safeik d'rabanon l'hakeil" kicks in; no bracha.

What's the difference?  In the case of s'firas ha'omer, the question is whether and and what level is one still obligated in the mitzvah.  Once that is determined, we know whether a bracha is required.  Chazal have given us guidelines on that.  If we are surely obligated in the mitzvah, then a bracha is required.  If we have no obligation to perform the mitzvah, obviously no bracha is required.  Between those two extremes are "safeik" and "s'feik s'feika".  On a simple "safeik" Chazal did not obligate us in a bracha, whereas on a "s'feik s'feika" they did.

In the case of the bracha acharona, however, the question is whether we are obligated in the bracha itself.  In that case, because of the severity of the issur of Sheim l'vatala, Chazal were more stringent in the conditions necessary to require a bracha in the case of doubt.

And you thought hilchos brachos was boring.  Heck no!  It's and E ticket ride, for sure!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…