Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Avos Kept the Entire Torah

There is a joke for parsha Chayei Sara: Rivka says to her parents, "I want to go with that man to marry Avraham's son."  "Rivky, sweety; you are only three years old!", said her aghast parents.  "I know," said Rivka, "but I am in the parsha." ba-dump-bump

The Maharal has explained how and why Shimon married Dina, while at the same time maintaining that the Avos kept the entire Torah.  That is, this is not a case of special circumstances requiring violation of the Torah.  Moreover, the Maharal absolutely rejects the Ramban's explanation that the Avos kept the Torah only in Eretz Yisrael.  (The Maharal is quite passionate about this point.)


The Maharal's point of view is as follows: How did Yaakov know that it is forbidden to marry two sisters?  He knew through ruach hakodesh.  How did Yaakov know he was supposed to marry Leah and Rochel?  He knew through ruach hakodesh.  This is absolutely not a  matter of Yaakov did whatever he wanted, chas v'shalom.  Rather, explains the Maharal (beautifully, in my humble opinion), "הפה שאסר, הוא הפה שהתיר" (K'subos 22a) -- the same source that said it was forbidden to marry two sisters also said it was permitted for him to marry Leah and Rochel.  In fact, it was still forbidden for Yaakov to marry to other sisters; he he was permitted to marry Leah and Rochel.  More broadly: Yehuda would not have performed yibum with another daughter-in-law; he performed yibum in the case that necessitated it.  Amram would not have married another aunt; he married the only aunt he was supposed to marry.

This shouldn't be too shocking, we have many examples.  The Torah says it is forbidden to do malacha on Shabbos.  The same Torah says that you are permittted to cook on Shabbos for a Jew who is deathly ill and needs that particular cooked food.  The Torah says to blow shofar on Rosh HaShana.  The same Torah tells us to listen to Chazal and not blow shofar on a Rosh HaShana that falls on Shabbos (even though no malacha would be performed).  I am sure you can think of many more examples.  These are not "exceptions"; they just mean that the simple rules (such as no cooking on Shabbos) are over generalizations.  The truth is that some cooking is permitted on Shabbos and some is not.  Cooking for an ill Jew on Shabbos is not an exception, it is simply a detail.  In fact, cooking something for that same Jew that he doesn't need, or even cooking more than he needs, is also forbidden.

The bottom line, then, is that the rules of determining what is permitted and what is forbidden depends on the epoch.  Before Matan Torah is one epoch.  From Matan Torah till the close of the gemara and end of s'micha is another epoch.  From then till now, a third.  The rules are suited to the needs of each epoch, while the Torah remains immutable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Thanking HaShem Each and Every Day for Solid Land Near Water

Each and every morning, a Jew is supposed to view himself as a new/renewed creation, ready for a new day of building his eternal self through Torah and mitzvos.  We begin the day with 16 brachos to praise/thank/acknowledge HaShem for giving us all the tools we need to succeed.  We have a body, soul, and intellect.  We have vision, mobility, and protection from the elements.  Among those brachos, we have one that perhaps seems a bit out of place: רוקע הארץ על המים/Who spreads out the land on/over the water.  After all, it's nice to have a dry place to walk, but does that compare to the gratitude I have for a working body and vision?  As it turns out, I should; as explained by the R' Rajchenbach, rosh kollel of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu (aka, Peterson Park Kollel).  Your best bet is to listen to the shiur; very distant second is to continue, which I hope will whet your appetite for the real thing.

First... since we have dry land, I don't have to slog to work through even a foot…

Thought for the Day: Using a Mitzvah Object for Non-Mitzvah Purposes

As I am -- Baruch HaShem -- getting older, I am more cognizant of the fact that I'd like to stay as healthy as possible right up the moment I leave this world.  Stuff hurting is not the problem (I am told there is an old Russian saying that once you are 40, if you wake up and nothing hurts -- you're dead), stuff not working, however, is a problem.  To that end, for several years now I commute to work by bicycle (weather permitting, 30 minutes on an elliptical machine when weather does not permit).  I recently took up some upper body weight training.  Not because I want to be governor of California, just simply to slow down loss of bone mass and extend my body's healthy span.  Simple hishtadlus.  I have an 18 month old grandson who is just the right weight for arm curls (yes... I am that weak), so I do about 10 reps when I greet him at night.  He laughs, I get my exercise; all good.  (Main problem is explaining to the older ones why zeidy can't give them the same "…

Thought for the Day: Hydroponically Grown Humans... I Feel Sick

I am quite openly not at all objective about abortion in particular and the treatment of human embryos and fetuses in general.  I am, after all, the survivor of a failed abortion attempt.  Not "thought about it, but couldn't go through with it"; not "made appointment, but then chickened out at the lost moment"; but, "tried a procedure, but was unsuccessful in attempt to abort".  Nonetheless, I try very hard to listen to the liberal arguments (which I also used to chant as part of the general liberal catechism), and am genuinely empathetic to the plight of women who find themselves in that difficult position.

What I heard on NPR this morning, however, has left me feeling physically ill.  You can read about it, if you like, but here's the bottom line:  Scientists in Cambridge have achieved a new record, they fertilized a human ova and then kept it alive in vitro (that is, in a test tube/petri dish in a laboratory) for 14 days.  The scientist involve…