Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Choose Life -- Eternal Life -- One Moment at a Time

Ever heard of the "Little Albert" experiment? I took three weeks of freshman psychology just over a half century ago; that's where I heard about it. They wanted to prove that humans work just like Pavlov's dog and can be trained. So they took a little baby who liked white rats and terrorized him with loud sounds every time the rat came near. They were able to demonstrate that little Albert (not his real name, but Google "little albert experiment" if you want to know more) eventually became terrified of rats even without the loud sounds. Beautiful. I wish I could say that is why I dropped, but I actually dropped because the course required too much reading. I loved listening to science and math lectures and then doing word problems; reading long winded articles about the human condition; not so much.

Of course, some people were understandably disturbed by the ethics of the experiment and a set of rules governing use of humans and other motile multi-cell life forms has evolved. Never fear, though, psychologists have figured out other ways to terrorize children. My favorite is the marshmallow experiment. The "marshmallow test," a psychological experiment by Walter Mischel, assesses a child's ability to delay gratification, offering a choice between one immediate reward (like a single marshmallow) or a larger reward (like two marshmallows) if they wait.

Besides making fun of a soft science, which is the custom of those of us in the hard sciences (especially physicists, as we consider all other sciences to be soft), I really do have a point. Chazal tell us (brachos 61b) that the world was only created for the completely wicked, such as Achav ben Ohmri (aka Ahab, husband of Jezebel) and the completely righteous, such as Chanina ben Dosa. Achav ben Ohmri chose to take all his pleasures the moment they were available. He is your classic one and done with marshmallows and every other physical pleasure; so HaShem created עולם הזה for him. Chanina ben Dosa, on the other hand, took only what he needed to maintain his health and strength to perform mitzvos in service of the Creator; so HaShem created עולם הבא for him.

It is clear from this gemara that evil and righteousness is all about intent and not actions. True enough, evil people will generally commit acts that normal, civilized people would consider, well, evil. Righteous people will act in ways that normal, civilized people would consider noble. But most of us -- me, anyway -- are not that consistent. True enough, I strive to have the right intentions and actions, but sometimes I just grab that marshmallow. How can Chazal say that the world was only created for the perfectly righteous and the perfectly evil? I think that is why the gemara gave a general statement followed by examples. Achav ben Ohmri and Chanina ben Dosa were able to perfect themselves to be consistent in their choices. They are our role models that a person can become whatever they want.

We say each morning in davening: who, in His abounding kindness, creates anew the world each day. In truth, each moment of our existence is a newly created reality for us to choose the marshmallow or service of the Creator. As we make each choice, we choose for that moment, but  also change who we are and the kind of person we are. Our choice at moment 1,345,577 is influenced by the choices and experiences of those first 1,345,576 moments. That means each moment is both itself and also the sum total of our lives up till then. HaShem in His infinite mercy and kindness allows us -- through t'shuva -- to convert the previous moments of our life from evil to good (or, chas v'shalom) the opposite.

We are not perfect -- yet. Neither Chanina ben Dosa nor Achav ben Ohmri were born righteous nor evil. They chose. We can, too.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...