Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Reviewing the Past for Future Redemption

There are few things more irritating than hearing, "I told you so." It is usually heard when trapped in a sticky situation that is the outcome -- direct or indirect -- of a group decision. Invariably, someone was not thrilled with the chosen course of action. Someone had a better idea, but they went along with the group. Now that things are falling apart, that one bitter "fine; I'll go along with you, but..." participant gets to double down and say, "See?! I told you so!"

Yet, we seem to read those very words in the Torah when the 10 sons of Yaakov who went for food are standing before the viceroy of Mitzrayim -- whom they do not recognize as their brother Yosef; the very brother they were seeking save -- and accused of being spies. They know this is an unfair and unwarranted accusation. Even so, they search their deeds to find some error that would warrant this treatment. They understand deeply that HaShem is orchestrating events to punish them for some slight error.

They finally realize (b'reishis 42:21), they failed to act with sufficient compassion when Yosef cried out to them from the pit. On the heels of which (pasuk 22), Reuvein responds, "didn't I tell you not to do that?"

Let's unpack this. First and foremost, the brothers do not feel any remorse about their decision that Yosef was guilty of a capital crime. They also have no regret about deciding to sell him rather than killing him themselves or leaving him in a pit with poisonous snakes and scorpions. Their remorse is only that they did not treat him with more compassion in response to his cries while they were carrying out the sentence they, as the effective Sanhedrin, had decreed. Moreover, they feel that their current situation of being held as prisoners of the state for treason, is warranted by that slight lack of human compassion.

The above can all be explained and it says so much about our illustrious ancestors. But not for now. We are concentrating on Reuvein's remarks/behavior.

So the brothers are earnestly and sincerely searching through their past actions so that this situation, this gift from HaShem to rectify the smudge on their exalted souls, can have the desired effect. True atonement, however, can only be realized if the person has done the necessary soul searching and found the cause of the smudge. In fact, part of the atonement process is precisely to get the person to make that investigation, which will itself permit him to correct his actions in the future.

On that point, Reuvein realizes they have missed the true root cause of this predicament. They erred in their decision that Yosef was guilty of a capital crime. How does Reuvein know that? If they were guilty simply of cruelty, they would be suffering from a cruel situation -- מידה כנגד מידה/measure for measure. But they are being falsely accused of a capital crime here. The מידה כנגד מידה/measure for measure dictates that they were guilty of that crime. Why does Reuvein also tell them, "as I told you"? In order to receive complete atonement, one must not only understand his sin, but also the depth of that sin. Reuvein is telling them that they did not take his words seriously enough at the time of their deliberations, which deepens the stain of the sin.

There is no anger among the brothers. There is only love and compassion and an earnest desire to help one another. The more one studies these portions of our Holy Torah, the more one gains appreciation for what true אהבת ישראל/love among Jews really means.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...