Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Reviewing the Past for Future Redemption

There are few things more irritating than hearing, "I told you so." It is usually heard when trapped in a sticky situation that is the outcome -- direct or indirect -- of a group decision. Invariably, someone was not thrilled with the chosen course of action. Someone had a better idea, but they went along with the group. Now that things are falling apart, that one bitter "fine; I'll go along with you, but..." participant gets to double down and say, "See?! I told you so!"

Yet, we seem to read those very words in the Torah when the 10 sons of Yaakov who went for food are standing before the viceroy of Mitzrayim -- whom they do not recognize as their brother Yosef; the very brother they were seeking save -- and accused of being spies. They know this is an unfair and unwarranted accusation. Even so, they search their deeds to find some error that would warrant this treatment. They understand deeply that HaShem is orchestrating events to punish them for some slight error.

They finally realize (b'reishis 42:21), they failed to act with sufficient compassion when Yosef cried out to them from the pit. On the heels of which (pasuk 22), Reuvein responds, "didn't I tell you not to do that?"

Let's unpack this. First and foremost, the brothers do not feel any remorse about their decision that Yosef was guilty of a capital crime. They also have no regret about deciding to sell him rather than killing him themselves or leaving him in a pit with poisonous snakes and scorpions. Their remorse is only that they did not treat him with more compassion in response to his cries while they were carrying out the sentence they, as the effective Sanhedrin, had decreed. Moreover, they feel that their current situation of being held as prisoners of the state for treason, is warranted by that slight lack of human compassion.

The above can all be explained and it says so much about our illustrious ancestors. But not for now. We are concentrating on Reuvein's remarks/behavior.

So the brothers are earnestly and sincerely searching through their past actions so that this situation, this gift from HaShem to rectify the smudge on their exalted souls, can have the desired effect. True atonement, however, can only be realized if the person has done the necessary soul searching and found the cause of the smudge. In fact, part of the atonement process is precisely to get the person to make that investigation, which will itself permit him to correct his actions in the future.

On that point, Reuvein realizes they have missed the true root cause of this predicament. They erred in their decision that Yosef was guilty of a capital crime. How does Reuvein know that? If they were guilty simply of cruelty, they would be suffering from a cruel situation -- מידה כנגד מידה/measure for measure. But they are being falsely accused of a capital crime here. The מידה כנגד מידה/measure for measure dictates that they were guilty of that crime. Why does Reuvein also tell them, "as I told you"? In order to receive complete atonement, one must not only understand his sin, but also the depth of that sin. Reuvein is telling them that they did not take his words seriously enough at the time of their deliberations, which deepens the stain of the sin.

There is no anger among the brothers. There is only love and compassion and an earnest desire to help one another. The more one studies these portions of our Holy Torah, the more one gains appreciation for what true אהבת ישראל/love among Jews really means.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...