Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When Is Chicken Not Like Beef With Regard to Milk?

When I was first married, I was in graduate school. Each morning I would put on my backpack, head over to my office, and then learn all day; physics, that is. Here I am several decades later and back to that routine, though now I head over to the beis medrash of Kollel Zichron Eliyahu, and learn Torah for a good portion of the day. Life is good. One other common activity is getting that first coffee at the office/beis medrash.. The conversations around the coffee station (hot water urn and a variety of instant coffees :) ) are a bit different though...

As I was getting my coffee, I addressed R' Schwimmer (whom I know from his excellent chumash shiur on Friday nights during the winter) and said, "I bet you would not be happy with me if I sat down in beis medrash to eat a turkey and Swiss sandwich, would you?" R' Schwimmer deftly replied, "HaShem wouldn't be happy with you." Fair enough. But why not?

Here's where that question came from. I have just started learning the halachos of meat and milk, siman 87 of Yoreh Deiah. Syef 4 says that one is not allowed to cook meat in (human) mother's milk because of מראית עין/it looks bad. Mother's milk is pareve, but it looks enough like cow's milk that one could mistake the concoction for a forbidden mixture of milk and meat. The Rema adds, "but regarding fowl, which is only forbidden by Rabbinic decree, you don't have to worry." The Shach (and others) note that the Rema means there is no problem with cooking chicken in mother's milk, but you certainly cannot eat it.

However, the Kaf HaChaim (s.k. 78) says that the Rema means that it is even permissible to eat it. Well, according to the letter of the law, but nowadays people would find it revolting to each mother's milk, so it is forbidden because of בל תשקצו -- separate prohibition in the Torah to not eat icky things.

So, back to my question. The Rema says that you can cook chicken in mother's milk because it is two Rabbinic decrees away from the Torah prohibition of meat (beef/lamb/kid) with milk (cow/sheep/goat). The Kaf HaChaim says you can even eat that mixture. So... turkey (already one step away) with cheese (another step away, as it is cold with cold; that is, not eating a clump of meat and milk cooked together) ought to be ok according to the Kaf HaChaim. In fact, we have a general principle that we do not apply Rabbinic prohibitions on top of each other, aka גזירה לגזירה לא גזרינן. Why do we cry foul to fowl with cheese at all? (I couldn't resist.)

After some lively discussion we finally decided that when dealing with the actual prohibition of eating and cooking meat with milk, then chicken is considered to be effectively meat by Rabbinic decree. That means that anything the Rabbis decreed about milk (cow/sheep/goat) with meat (beef/lamb/kid) will also apply to (kosher) fowl (chicken, turkey, etc). That means it is all one decree. On the other hand, when one decree is for a different issue -- מראית עין/it looks bad, in this case -- then we certainly will apply the general principle of גזירה לגזירה לא גזרינן. (At least according to the Kaf HaChaim).

While the actual content of the conversations around the coffee station have changed, the intent hasn't really changed for me. We are still interested in getting a deeper understanding of reality. Some people never grow up; Baruch HaShem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...