Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Divrei Torah Online and On Paper

I volunteer once a month or so for ChesedChicago, which is the rebranded name for the Chicago Chesed Fund. In a nutshell, what started as a personal chesed fund project launched by R' Shmuel Fuerst some 40 years ago has grown into much, much more than a fund. Baruch HaShem, the Chicago Jewish community supports this kind of growth. This last Sunday I got an unexpected benefit. The volunteers were invited to an appreciation brunch. That was not the benefit. R' Fuerst himself came to thank us and tell us how important volunteers are to the successful operations managed by ChesedChicago. That wasn't the benefit, but it was why I went -- I felt that since R' Fuerst felt this was important enough to take time from his busy schedule, then it should be important enough for me to attend. The benefit was that R' Fuerst stayed to answer any questions we had. No phones, no "just a minute, other line"; just us. Priceless.

In a recent TftD about the meaning and purpose of prayer, I quoted a verse from the Torah that included HaShem's four letter name -- aka (for you Greek buffs) the Tetragrammaton; aka, for the rest of us, the Shem HaShem. A very good friend of mine remarked that I may want to replace the Tetragrammaton (cool word, no?) with just 'ה; aka hey chikchuk. I was about to, then realized: (1) if the current text contains a name that can't be erased, then I am not allowed to replace it (as that would constitute erasing); (2) if the text can be replaced, then I don't need to; as there is clearly no problem with erasing. Clearly I needed to ask R' Fuerst about this and I would need some time for context, and it would be easier in person without phone interruptions. Baruch HaShem, that's what I got!

One interesting note before proceeding: there is an opinion that a 'ה is just as much a name that can't be erased as the Tetragrammaton. At least as a stringency, one needs to be aware of that.

Here is a summary. The Tetragrammaton on a computer screen is not a name that cannot be erased. The only reason, therefore to change it would be in case someone wanted to print out that TftD. But here's the thing, printed divrei Torah are shemos -- whether or not they contain the Tetragrammaton. Yes, even my humble TftD, which is certainly divrei Torah, needs to be treated as shemos. This is an important fact that is not so well known. It has one caveat -- that is only true if the main focus of the document is the divrei Torah. If the document contains other things -- announcements of births and marriages and whatnot, then it depends on what the focus is. R' Fuerst gives a simple test: what is the first thing people look at when they pick it up. If most people immediately turn to the back to find the announcements, then it's not shemos.

One last point, though: the custom is not to use the Tetragrammaton in divrei Torah, but to use the 'ה. Ok, so I changed it. I would not have gotten all those details over the phone.

Jealous that I got all that time with the rav? You should be. I can help you with that one. Go to the Get Involved page at ChesedChicago.org. Most of the needs are not about money, they are about your time. The need is great; the reward -- priceless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...