Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Problem with Infinity, Perfection, and Appearance

I have an interesting demonstration of our inability to fully grasp infinity. Start with the set of all counting numbers, we'll call that A. So set A contains 1,2,3,4,.... Now we are going to make two new sets using A as a start and applying a rule.

For the first new set, the rule is to take each element from A and square it; we'll call this set B. So B contains 1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2 --> 1, 4, 9, 16, ... 
Note well: for every number in A there is a corresponding number in B.

For the other new set, we are going to filter elements from A. That is, we won't copy all the elements of A, we'll only copy the perfect squares. So:
1 from A gets copied to C
2 from A does *not* get copied to C
3 from A does *not* get copied to C
4 from A gets copied to C
etc

So C contains: 1, 4, 9, 16, ...
Note well: Not every element in A has a corresponding element in C; we only copied some of them. A quite small fraction, actually, when you consider how perfect squares get more and more spread out.

Here's the magic part, though: B and C both contain exactly the same numbers! Every number in B is also in C; every number in C is also in B. Yet, B took everything from A, but C only took some elements from A -- there are plenty of elements in A that have no corresponding element in C. We can see logically that they are the same, but our experience (with the finite) tells us that B should be somehow bigger than C. It takes work to reconcile our knowledge (B and C are the same) with our experience (B is surely bigger than C, isn't it?!). We can never completely reconcile them, but we can at get a feel that our finite nature prevents us from completely understanding the infinite.

That helps to clarify an absolutely fundamental issue or our existence. Namely, we know with absolute clarity that the Creator is completely perfect and all good -- the Creator, after all, is the very definition of infinite and also good. Our experience, however, tells us otherwise. In the words of the Ramchal in his classic work דעת תבונות, the soul presents her quest for understanding this way:
The existence of the Creator, His oneness, the eternity of His existence, His incorporeality, His absolute freedom of will, ... all clear. But divine providence, reward and punishment, the coming of the messiah, and ultimately the resurrection of the dead -- I believe, because those are fundamental beliefs of our religion, but I am seeking at least a way to understand the idea of them.

From my little math example above, we see that HaShem is not hiding anything from us. Rather it is our result of our bounded and finite nature. There are things in creation that are just beyond us -- and even contradict our experience and intuition.

It takes work to reconcile our knowledge with our experience. It it will never be -- well, perfect, since we ourselves are limited/bounded. Using our G-d Given minds -- and use them me must, since He built us with them -- to reconcile our knowledge/reason with our experience and intuition is a lifetime of work. 

It is, in fact, the reason that we have a life in this world at al.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more