Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Chasid, Righteous, Honest -- The Three Paths to Perfection

Consider, please, verses 26 and 27 from T'hillim, chapter 18:

עִם-חָסִיד תִּתְחַסָּד;    עִם-גְּבַר תָּמִים, תִּתַּמָּם.
עִם-נָבָר תִּתְבָּרָר;    וְעִם-עִקֵּשׁ, תִּתְפַּתָּל. 

These verses speak to the basic/fundamental manner with which HaShem interacts with His creation. In broad strokes we say מידה כנגד מידה/measure for measure. Here, however, Dovid HaMelech drills down a bit and gives us four approaches (rough/free translation):

  1. עִם-חָסִיד תִּתְחַסָּד -- with the pious/devout, You act devoutly
  2. עִם-גְּבַר תָּמִים, תִּתַּמָּם -- with the innocent/whole-hearted, You act with simplicity (no hidden agenda)
  3. עִם-נָבָר תִּתְבָּרָר -- with the honest/trustworthy, You act in faithfulness
  4. וְעִם-עִקֵּשׁ, תִּתְפַּתָּל -- but with the crooked/perverse, You act as if everything is happenstance

It is striking that Dovid HaMelech decided to break down the positive conduct into three distinct channels, where as the all who act as if there is no one running the show are lumped together and treated to a world that runs by itself. I won't say anything more about this conduct; I think it speaks for itself.

The Malbim describes each attribute: חָסִיד -- all their actions are above and beyond the call of duty. תָּמִים -- each action is weighed against the all relevant obligations and the course taken fulfills each and every expectation and demand precisely without deviation. נָבָר -- is always careful to guard against doing anything wrong/evil/bad. Sounds like we are going from best to worst, no? From "over and above" to "fulfills his obligations" to "careful not to do anything bad" to "bad".

Yet, Rashi says these three conducts correspond to our patriarchs, Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov. The Targum Yonason, in fact, explicitly lists the patriarchs names in the verses: With Avraham -- who was a חָסִיד..., with Yitzchak, who was גְּבַר תָּמִים..., with Yaakov, who was נָבָר. That doesn't line up with our first thought about how to understand these three character traits.

Shockingly -- as is often the case (and yet I am still always shocked) -- the first thought was wrong and so we need to go back to really understand what Dovid HaMelech wants us to know. Ok, so I can't possibly think that I really understand the exalted intentions of David HaMelech, but I can share what I have taken away after learning the explanations offered through the centuries proffered by our sages. I hope that the leason I have gleaned is in line with the intentions of our great ancestor.

Avraham Avinu is our prototypical חָסִיד. While recovering from a difficult surgery at an advanced age, he was still looking to serve wayfarers. When he merited to perform that mitzvah, he went way above and beyond. Each guest was not only served fresh tongue with mustard, each guest actually received the tongue from an animal that had been slaughtered specifically for him. That is above and beyond even the (ahem) regular above and beyond.

Yitzchak Avinu is our prototypical גְּבַר תָּמִים. When it was time for him to give the ultimate sacrifice -- his life itself -- his concern was that not even an unintentional flinch at the last moment should detract from the perfection of his sacrifice. Hence, he asked his father to bind him -- arms and legs -- so that every detail of the mitzvah would be fulfilled precisely and without deviation.

Yaakov Avinu is our prototypical נָבָר. When he had to work for the perverse and crooked Lavan, Yaakov Avinu suffer freezing cold and stifling heat to protect even a single lamb. If a wild animal managed to take one of the stragglers, Yaakov Avinu paid back from his own wages. All of this so even the crooked and perverse Lavan could not find anything wrong with the service Yaakov Avinu was providing in the job for which he was hired.

Clearly the patriarchs were not "looking to get by", but were each approaching avodas HaShem using the unique personality imbued in them from the Creator. We know that each of our patriarchs achieved perfection in their service to the Creator. However, each looked into himself to find the best unique and custom path for achieving that goal.

David HaMelech tells us, then: You may think there are lots of way to be perverse, but you are wrong. Every perverse behaviour is painted with single label, עִקֵּשׁ. For that, the reward, so to speak, is not being able to see HaShem at all, for everything is תִּתְפַּתָּל/warped and happenstance.

If you want to achieve perfection and wholeness with your Creator, though, then look to our patriarchs. Learn from their examples. Use your unique תכונות הנפש -- spiritual/emotional/physical/intellectual/... qualities -- to seek perfection and you will be rewarded with not only open and apparent Divine Providence, but open and apparent Divine Providence that is tailored to you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק

Thought for the Day: Love in the Time of Corona Virus/Anxiously Awaiting the Mashiach

Two scenarios: Scenario I: A young boy awakened in the middle of the night, placed in the back of vehicle, told not to make any noise, and the vehicle speeds off down the highway. Scenario II: Young boy playing in park goes to see firetruck, turns around to see scary man in angry pursuit, poised to attack. I experienced and lived through both of those scenarios. Terrifying, no? Actually, no; and my picture was never on a milk carton. Here's the context: Scenario I: We addressed both set of our grandparents as "grandma" and "grandpa". How did we distinguish? One set lived less than a half hour's drive; those were there "close grandma and grandpa". The other set lived five hour drive away; they were the "way far away grandma and grandpa". To make the trip the most pleasant for all of us, Dad would wake up my brother and I at 4:00AM, we'd groggily -- but with excitement! -- wander out and down to the garage where we'd crawl

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo