Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When Can You Relax and Just Coast? Not In This World...

I got an email yesterday reminding me that it was Rosh Chodesh today and tomorrow, so davening would be starting 10 minutes earlier. Not to be outdone, the vasikin minyan started earlier today and will start even more earlier tomorrow. On the one hand, we are only starting earlier than usual by a few seconds. On the other hand, we are starting at 4:49 AM CDT. You decide who is more frum. 😛

Fine, fine... we are not starting earlier because of Rosh Chodesh. In fact, next Rosh Chodesh, we'll be starting later each day. Rosh Chodesh, of course, has nothing at all to do with when we daven. What's the point (besides the obvious showing off how dedicated us vasikin daveners are, while taking a jab at the rest of the world; just saying)? The point, though, is to underscore how bad it is to jump to conclusions from a tiny data set. The Pele Yo'eitz has an entire section devoted to the evils of הֶסַח הַדַעַת/running on auto-pilot. I wrote a post some time ago that hits the topic the topic with a broad brush: Your יֵצֶר הָרָע Wants Every Battle And The War. I was debating whether to write another mussar piece, but then I say a very practical הלכה למעשה/real life example.

The Shulchan Aruch 216 discusses brachos on scents. One of the scents discussed is musk, which is a scent derived from the secretions of certain animals. The Mishna Brura (sk 7) notes that there is a discussion among the poskim if musk comes from the sweat of the animal or its blood. Regardless, the actual musk scent itself is a powder; very far removed from its source.  The Mishna Brura, in fact, concludes that musk may be added to food -- even according to the poskim who say its source is the blood of the animal -- because it is simply dust at this point. (The Chazon Ish is stringent; CYLOR.)

The Biur Halacha (d.h. musk :) ) starts by making a seemingly obvious point: The only argument is whether you can add it to food, but everyone -- even according to who hold it comes from the blood of the animal -- have no issue with smelling it.  Obvious conclusion: there is no problem smelling something, even though it is forbidden to be eaten. Yep, I'm thinking as I am reading it, that's pretty clear; I wonder where he is going with this. The next few words answered that question: Well... maybe not. Perhaps there only reason it is permissible to smell musk is because it is a scent and not a food. That is, even when musk is added to food, it is only to add a dimension to the scent, not for taste. Perhaps smelling a forbidden food would also be forbidden, to forestall coming to eat it.

So here you have a straightforward halacha in Shulchan Aruch and Mishna Brura. The inference seems obvious. So obvious, in fact, that you may conclude that the Mishna Brura didn't mention it because it was so evident. Only problem, though, is that it is wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...