Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: When A Pocket Is Muktza, But the Garment Is Not

I was the envy of all the other bike commuters last week. Why? I had brought a windbreaker. What's the big deal? It was cold on the commute home. Why didn't the others have a windbreaker? It was warm for the morning commute and -- fer cryin' out loud -- it's May... how cold could it get? Why did I have a windbreaker? I live in Chicago, where weather apps are still more for laughs than practical use. Why didn't they -- who also live in Chicago and have for some time -- not have windbreakers? Never underestimate the power and allure of wishful thinking.

Speaking of unexpectedly needing a raincoat on Shabbos (smooth segue, no?): You have a work credit card in your possession that is needed by a non-Jewish coworker, Bob. Bob needs it for a business trip and he is leaving Saturday evening; he will only be in your neighborhood for a couple of hours Saturday morning. No problem, you decide; you'll just leave it in the right pocket of your raincoat that you'll leave hanging in your covered porch. All goes as planned. You put the credit card into the pocket of your raincoat and hang the raincoat on a peg inside your covered porch on Friday before candle lighting. Bob shows up about 10:30 AM, goes into your porch to retrieve the card, then makes his exit.  (He may or may not stop to say hello; Bob's a funny guy.)  Later that afternoon it starts raining and you'd like to visit your grandchildren who live just a few blocks away. You are about to grab your raincoat when you remember that credit card...

Why is that important? After all, the credit card is already on its way to Fiji with Bob. What a great time to review hilchos muktzeh!  There are different categories of muktzeh, the most insidious being מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically muktzeh; aka, evil muktzeh. Something which is מוקצה מחמת גופו, such a money and credit cards, are by their very nature set out of your mind on Shabbos. They have absolutely no permitted use on Shabbos, so they cannot be moved even if you their place. (You can't need the item itself; it has no permissible use on Shabbos, remember?) That's step one. Step two is: when muktzeh is placed on a supporting object -- table, tray, pocket -- that supporting object takes on the same status as the muktzeh itself. The supporting object is known in halacha as a בסיס. The word "בסיס" sounds a lot like "base", which is also it's translation. However, בסיס is not really a base, so homonymism in this case is misleading. I shall therefore leave it untranslated and untransliterated. Step three: the בסיס is identified so closely with the muktzeh, that it retains that status even if the muktzeh itself is removed. At this point, you are thinking, "Ah... credit card was removed, but pocket still has status of מוקצה מחמת גופו, so now you can't move the raincoat, so both you and your grandchildren is now sad. (The emotional state of your grandchildrens' parents will depend on whether the joy of getting to take a nap outweighs the emotional baggage of dealing with their parent/in-law. Your mileage may vary.)

Not so fast! Steps one, two, and three are 100% correct. The conclusion, however, is a mistake. The pocket most certainly is, as a בסיס to the long gone credit card, מוקצה מחמת גופו. As such, the pocket may not be moved... directly, any way. Here's the thing: the coat (notes the Mishna Brura) is certainly not a בסיס to the coat. In fact, the pocket is wholly subordinate to the coat. That means that the coat never became a בסיס to the credit card! You can go ahead and wear that raincoat to visit your grandchildren! Even though one is not allowed to move muktzeh, in this case you are moving the coat -- and the pocket is considered insignificant with respect to the coat. The pocket is just carried along for the ride, as it were.

One caveat: you may not use the pocket; not to carry something on Yom Tov nor even to keep your hands dry on Shabbos. True, the prohibition is regarding moving muktzeh, not touching it. However, it is impossible to touch the flimsy pocket without causing some movement, so even touching it will be forbidden.

The astute and careful reader my wonder why -- once we have concluded that the pocket is insignificant compared to the coat -- the coat can't be worn even if the credit card is still in the pocket. Good question. If it comes up, ask your rav.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...