Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Belief In Creation is a Game Changer

Now that my children are grown and have their own families with their own abodes, this is how it works. When I go to my childrens' homes, I knock and then wait to be invited before walking in. Once inside, I pretty much stay to the living room, dining room, and first floor bathroom. I do not go upstairs. Nor do I take even a glass of water without first asking. When my children come to my house, they knock and then walk in. They pretty much have free roaming around the house -- with the exception of some obviously private areas -- and are comfortable getting themselves something to eat or drink without asking specific permission. My grandchildren don't knock, they just come in. They are unaware that there are private areas. They only ask if they can have this or that if they can't reach it.

Obviously, since the children grew up in our house, they learned from a very early age what they could take/touch and what they couldn't. They never questioned our authority to be able to set "rules of engagement" in our home; we were/are the parents, after all. Yes, they are completely normal and certainly question every other aspect of our authority! The certainly whined and complained (from time to time 🙄) about the rules themselves, but they never actually question our right to make those rules. The reason is obvious -- it's our house and we invited them in.

Things are even more formal at work, of course. I would never dream to walk into someone's office uninvited. I wouldn't rummage through their drawers nor even the papers on their desk without specific instructions to do so. I would certainly not sit down to their computer and start looking through their emails. Even my own computer is really not my computer, but given to me by the company to use when doing their work. (And, equally obviously, for permissible personal activities that to not interfere nor compete with my work responsibilities; all as clearly stipulated in the employee manual.)

Here's the punchline: HaShem created this world. He is not simply a very powerful being who can manipulate this world any way He wants. That's a silly and immature concept. (The late Stephen Hawking promulgated that as his concept of what god is, and therefore decided to be an atheist. That is the classic "garbage in, garbage out"; he started from a ridiculous premise and ended up with a conclusion that matched.)

Rather, HaShem is the Creator and Author of the entire creation. This is His world and His alone. I am a guest here. A beloved guest, to be sure; but a guest all the same. I may (and, to my shame, certainly do) whine and complain about some of the rules. I also (to even more of my shame) violate those rules. I never ever, though -- not even once, question His right to make those rules. I, on the other hand, have no rights; only obligations. That thought is so endemic to all of Torah philosophy that there is not even a word for "rights" in the Holy Tongue.

Once that is understood, the Torah is not seen as restrictive at all! Kosher dietary laws don't restrict my eating; they delineate a myriad of foods that I am permitted to eat and how to prepare them. The laws relating to whom I may marry are not restrictive; they are beautifully freeing me to fulfill the Will of the Creator to continue the species. Shabbos is not a restriction of my activities; it is freeing me from the mundane requirements of keeping the world running and allowing me rest and relaxation.

No wonder that we declare three times on the entry of every Shabbos that HaShem is the Creator and Author of reality. Once as preparation for our evening prayer on Friday night. A second time as a community declaration. A third time in my home as I inaugurate and sanctify the Shabbos with my family. It's a beautiful world and life; I am so very fortunate to be here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...