Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Baseless Hatred and Demanding Strict Justice -- Two Destructive Behaviours

My research advisor used to start his introductory lecture to freshman physics with a warning: "Some people say there is no such thing as a stupid question.  They are wrong."  I know without doubt that R' Fuerst has heard his share of stupid questions.  In fact, I can testify (with some shame, to be sure) that I have added to that genre.  I can also testify that R' Fuerst has always handled the questions with grace and patience with nary a trace of exasperation.  (R' Fuerst has, in fact, only hung up on a caller once.  He told us about it, so I know how far things have to go before the rabbi labels a queestion as stupid.)

Here's one very cool story that I heard from R' Schmelzer of Telshe, when he spent part of a summer at Camp Nageela Midwest some years ago along with R' Fuerst.  Camp Nageela provides an Orthodox Jewish experience for Jewish kids who do not come from an Orthodox home.  R' Schmelzer and R' Fuerst were walking to the lunchroom when a kid came running over to R' Fuerst yelling, "Hey, you!  Look at this frog I found!"  R' Schmelzer went pale at hearing someone talk to the dayan like that.  R' Fuerst, however, carefully examined the frog and shared the young man's excitement.  There is no question that the young man would have understood if someone had told him that there are better ways to talk to an important person like R' Fuerst.  R' Fuerst, however -- without missing a beat -- handled the situation beautifully and acted clearly לפנים משורת הדין/beyond the letter of the law.

The gemara (Bava Metzia 30b) relates a story that involved R' Yishmael the son of R' Yosi handling another situation with grace where person making the request clearly also had no idea about how to talk to an important person.  The gemara ends by quoting R' Yochanan as saying that Yerushalayim was only destroyed because people were not acting לפנים משורת הדין/beyond the letter of the law.

Hang on there!  Haven't we heard loud and clear that Yerushalayim was destroyed because of שנאת חינם/baseless hatred?!  Doesn't that make much more sense?  I can certainly understand hatred among Jews causing us to lose our precious Beis HaMikdash.  But not going beyond the letter of the law?  Isn't that extra credit?  Maybe I won't get the sixth aliyah on Shabbos; but I deserve to be kicked out of shul for because I didn't graciously give up my seat and offer the stranger my tallis?

As it turns out, Tosafos asks the question; right there on the page.  One of those short, one line Tosafos that are either just a quick p'shat or something quite cryptic.  This one is both.  Tosafos asks that this contradicts the quote from R' Yochanan (Yoma 60b) that lays the blame squarely on שנאת חינם/baseless hatred.  Tosafos gives a chilling answer: הא והא גרמא/they both caused it.  Google translate, by the way, gives this very non-literal translation of that: This is a terrible thing.  Well... I agree... this is a terrible thing!

On the other hand, maybe it's not such a terrible thing.  As a good friend of mine says, I have absolutely no baseless hatred for anyone -- I have very good reasons for all of my hatred.  So fixing שנאת חינם is not such an easy thing.  On the other hand, working on acting לפנים משורת הדין/beyond the letter of the law is not so terrible.  I can take little steps; like washing the spoon left in the sink by the last person, or putting even the books I didn't use back on shelf.  And, besides, I can pat myself on the back for being such a big tzadik.  So first I'll work on getting back the Beis HaMikdash and then I'll work on my arrogance.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...