Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Correcting a Wrong Takes Common Sense

Overheard in nursery by new father that had just been brought a white baby that the nurses claimed was his: "No, no, and no!  My wife and I are Chinese, and everyone knows that two Wongs don't make a white!"  (Wow... that is so totally not PC!  Especially now that we know that there are no absolutes... race, gender, even species, I suppose are all just point on a spectrum.)  Three rights do, however, make a left.  Moreover, two Wrights do make an airplane.  We all know, though, that two wrongs definitely do not make a right.  (Sorry!  I just cannot quell that 10 year old boy in me.  I suppose I should also apologize that neither do I have any desire to quell him.)

Let's make no mistake about it: stealing is bad; very, very bad.  Our sages tell us that the fate of Sodom was not sealed until they started stealing from each other in a way that was not punishable (the value of each theft was too small to prosecute).  What about a wife stealing from her husband?  That seems worse, no?  I mean... what kind of marriage is that!?

A very good one, actually.  Moreover, it's not stealing.  Moreover it is being sneaky to preserve a basically sound marriage and a wonderful home for several children.  Moreover it was entirely executed under rabbinic supervision.

A young woman came to her rav with the following back story.  She loved her husband; he was a very good provider and father; he had good character traits, davened regularly, and had time set aside each week for learning Torah.  With all that, he had a flaw that was causing her emotional distress and anxiety.  He worked as a manager in a local grocery store; he was a hard worker and well liked at work by colleagues and bosses alike.  What could possibly be wrong?  He brought home left over/extra chickens from work.  She was distraught that she we eating and feeding to her family stolen meat for Shabbos.

In fact, he had started as a manager in the fish department.  When he brought home extra/leftover fish, she sat down and spoke with him.  However, he felt justified in taking the fish because he was a hard worker and gave them more than their money's worth.  She was not able to change his mind and was fearful that it would become a shalom bayis issue.  She had an idea, though.  She privately spoke to her husband's manager and told him that she was particularly sensitive to smells and that the strong smell of his clothing was very difficult for her.  He was very understanding and agreed to take care of things.  That's when he transferred her husband to the chicken department.  Obviously, she cannot speak again to the store manager.

Her question was simple.  She sees no other path but to quietly steal money from her husband's wallet and pay for the chickens.  Before she did that, however; she went to the rav.  Stealing is, after all, a very serious offense.  The rav told her that stealing is never justified; but, in fact, that would not be stealing.  Since the chickens were taken without permission, he actually owed the money to the store.  She was simply paying his debts.  Since a Jewish soul always yearns to do the right thing, in fact -- even though our evil inclination sometimes prevents us from acting on the desire.

We live in a society that screams at us to stridently do what we think is right; scorners (who obviously misunderstand our one true way) be damned.  That is not Torah way.  אמת means that which is done for right reasons to achieve a laudable result.  שקר is the opposite.  She first gently approached her husband directly.  When that failed, she tried a mild subterfuge.  When that didn't work she went to the rav for דעת תורה/da'as Torah/insight molded by the Creator.  That's not just how a Jew lives, that's why we are in this world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...