Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Suffering/Discipline/Rebuke -- Limited Scope By Design

I have perfect joke to make the point I would like to address, but I am not sure it will be received well.  Feel free to ask me in person.  In the meantime, now put yourself in the frame of mind that you have heard a good joke (I know it good, because my Dad, a"h -- who was known for his excellent sense of humor -- told it to me) and are now excited to see how this connects to a lesson in ישעיהו/Isaiah.

ישעיהו tells the nation (28:23-29): Does the farmer plow and plant, but never reap?  Does he process wheat, barley, and cumin the same way?  Even cumin and black cumin are treated differently... This also comes from the LORD of hosts: Wonderful is His counsel, and great His wisdom.  (My free to the point of only barely recognizably related to the original translation.)

Um.... what?

ישעיהו expends much effort on rebuke.  Now he is explaining: Do you think this is for nothing?  That you hear the rebuke, that you accept suffering, that you even discipline yourselves... and then continue your lives like nothing happened?  Just at plowing and sowing are only a means to an end, so to is suffering and discipline.  You must use those means to effect positive change in your life!

Still... where is the "This also comes from the LORD of hosts: Wonderful is His counsel, and great His wisdom"?  Surely the message is true, but it doesn't seem to be so wondrous and deeply wise.  In the tech world we call this a PICNIC error: Problem In Chair, Not In Computer.  It is, of course, I who is not so wondrous nor deeply wise.  Baruch HaShem, I have been listening to excellent shiurim by Rabbi Aaron Chaim Lapidoth on ישעיהו.  He covers a chapter or less per shiur; slow enough to get some depth, fast enough to keep the historical context and follow the development.

R' Lapidoth notes that the farmer has no interest in "punishing" the land by plowing it, nor the grain by threshing and winnowing it.  If the land is not plowed, the seed can't grow.  If the chaff is not broken away from the grain, it can't be used for food.  If the seeds are not carefully separated by winnowing, then they will not achieve their full potential.  Each step is performed with expertise and wisdom; even the timing is important.  Threshing first and plowing later won't do the job.

But there is more.  The entire field is plowed; some lessons and trials apply to the nation as a whole.  Yet the process to thresh the wheat would pulverise the cumin.  The winnowing of the cumin would leave the barley unimproved.  The Navi is explaining that there are national events that shape the nation.  But there are also extremely personal events that shape each individual.

And the overall message?  All of this -- all suffering; all trials and tribulations -- have a limit.  They are for a purpose, and once that purpose has been achieved, they are gone.  As we read on public fast days; just as the rain does not return to heaven before it has brought out the grain, so to the Word of HaShem does not return until it has brought us to our perfection.  All tailored to each and every individual Jew.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction.  That is, even th

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Shabbo

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aruch HaRav that referred to the noise of תקתוק