Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Challah as תרומה... With a Twist

Now that you know much more about wheat and flour than you ever cared to know, here's one reaons that knowledge is important.  Rye bread is actually made from a mixture of rye and wheat flours (1:2.5 in one recipe I saw).  (And therefore?  I hear you wondering...)  Rye and wheat are not generally harvested at the same time of year; moreover, harvests are earlier in the southern part of the country (where it gets warmer sooner) than the north.  (Sigh... and therefore?)  Well, then, a bakery could very well end up making a rye bread dough that is about 30% rye from last year and 70% what from this year.  (Please have mercy... and therefore what, for crying out loud?)

So here's what: Challah is a kind of תרומה.  When you have stuff that requires תרומה to be taken, it is considered a forbidden food until you actually separate a small portion as תרומה.  That small portion of תרומה can only be eaten by a Cohein (though we don't do that now-a-days; don't worry about that now).  The rest of the food is now permitted to all of us.  You don't need to take a piece of every apple, obviously; you just take a bit from a pile of apples.  You can even take a small portion of תרומה on one pile of apples and have that work for another pile of apples -- provided, however, that both piles are from the same year.  (Ah... light is dawning... rye and wheat are from different years...)

Challah is weird, though, because the requirement of challah is on dough, and even then only if you have enough dough.  So... let's say you have exactly a shiur (call it 5 lbs, just for argument's sake) of rye bread dough.  On the one hand, we could say that we only have 1.5 lbs of rye and 3.5 lbs of wheat -- both below the shiur of challah -- so we don't need to take challah at all.  On the other hand, we have 5 lbs of dough -- which is the requisite shiur -- so challah needs to be taken, but now I have the issue of flours from two different years.  If it is, then I have two possible solutions: (1) I could make a shiur of rye dough and another shiur or wheat dough and take challah from each of those on the appropriate parts of my original dough.  (2) If the is rye בטול/nullified in the wheat, I can take challah from my dough?

Surprise!  It's a machlokes Rashi and Tosefos.  At issue is how does ביטול actually work?  Rashi says that once something is ביטול, it has completely lost its own identity.  According to Rashi, then, it seems that we have 5 lbs of wheat dough.  According to Tosefos, something that is ביטול no longer counts, but it doesn't lose its identity.  According to Tosefos, then, if you had a dough with 5 lbs of wheat flour and 4 lbs of rye (for our purposes we only need a majority), then you could take challah.  In our case, though, the rye is certainly בטול, but now we only have 3.5 lbs of dough -- below the shiur, so the only option you have is the make the other doughs [solution (1), above].  Isn't that cool?

What to do?  Good question.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...