Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Surrogate Motherhood -- Argument That It Is Impossible to Determine Whether Birth Or Genetic Mother is Halachic Mother

On the issue of who is the halachic mother in the case of surrogate motherhood, we have seen an argument for the genetic mother and an argument for the birth mother.  Both had proponents, but neither had the universal acceptance.  (Ok... almost nothing this complex has universal acceptance, but neither has even enough acceptance to definitively declare, "This is the halacha.")  There is one more argument, that it is impossible to make such a determination.  (Spoiler alert: this argument will suffer the same fate as the other two; we'll deal with that shortly.)

For those of you who do not live in Chicago or Eretz Yisrael: let's review the relevant halachos of חדש (new grain) and ישן (older grain).  The Torah forbids the use of new grain until after הקרבת העומר/the Omer offering is brought, which is on the second day of Pesach -- 16 Nissan.  When we have the בית המקדש, then חדש grain changes status to ישן with הקרבת העומר; nowadays, we wait till 17 Nissan.  You may be wondering... no, you should be wondering (unless this is all old had for you, in which case you can skip to the next paragraph) what criteria determine whether the grain is from this year's or last year's crop.  Great question!  The answer is: grain that took root and grew at least a third before הקרבת העומר is from last year's crop, otherwise it is from this year's.

At this point you most definitely should be wondering what in the world this has to do with surrogate motherhood.  Your wait is over: Chazal address the situation of grain that has grown more than a third before הקרבת העומר (ie, it is ישן), then was uprooted and replanted (:מנחות צ'ט).  Regarding the new growth, ask Chazal, do we consider it to be an extension of the old growth and so it is ישן, or is it considered completely new growth and is therefore חדש?  Tada!  That's precisely our question: do we look at the new growth (the fetus) as a continuation of the original growth of the ova, or is it considered now as a growth from the uterus of the new (surrogate) mother.

Drum roll please... the answer is: תיקו... question cannot be resolved; let it stand; maybe Eliyahu will be able to clarify it for us, or not.  Anyway, even if we did know how this works out, R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach was not so excited about a proof regarding humans from plant growth.  I don't know what he didn't like, but it is certainly understandable as the mechanism of adding more plant growth is nothing at like the creation/growth of the embryo in a human.

Bottom like, we started with four possibilities (none, both, genetic, birth) and have concluded it is either the birth or genetic mother, but there is no universally accepted proof of which, and we even have one argument that it is unknowable (to us).  That means the kid will not be able to marry any of either mother's relatives, but he will also not be able to inherit from either mother.

It's times like this that I appreciate having no halachic relatives; much simpler!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more