Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Ova or Uterus -- Who's the Mother?

This question -- consciously expressed or not -- is at the basis of a many discussions of Torah observance in the modern world:
What if the Torah were given now?  I mean, we have all this cool, gee-whiz technology and stuff that the ancients didn't, so the Torah would be different, right?
That question is something like asking, "If the engineers who built this drop on the Matterhorn Bobsleds ride at Disneyland had known that we would be on this cart carrying our cell phones, would they have built it differently?  I mean, wouldn't they have taken into account that I might have something in my pocket that could fall out?"  Actually then engineers who built that ride most certainly knew that people might have something expensive in their pockets that might fall out.  They engineered for it, the made provisions for it.  You won't see a mention of cell phones in the original plans, but you certainly will see provisions for people with pockets and stuff in those pockets.

As an example, let us consider very modern medical issue: surrogate motherhood.  You might think, "Well!  This issue was certainly never imagined in the received tradition!"  You might think that; and you would certainly be wrong.

Before proceeding, though, it is important to understand the halachic significance of the question.  That is important, because in cases where there is no halachic significance, you are very likely not going to find any references in our sources.  This world is for no reason other than as an environment in which to realize the concepts of the Torah as concrete mitzvos.  There are actually five possibilities:

  1. The child is related to his genetic mother, but not his birth mother.  In this case he can marry relatives of his birth mother, but only inherits from his genetic mother.
  2. The opposite: the child is related to his birth mother, but not his genetic mother.  Basically same as above, just roles reversed.
  3. The child has two mothers.  Now he has a big family; he can't marry relatives from either side, but he is a full heir to both sides.
  4. The child has no (halachic) mother.  Itty bitty family; marry whomever he wants, no inheritance.
  5. The matter remains in doubt.  On the marriage issue one will need to say ספק דאורייתא לחומרא and he can't marry anyone related to either side.  On the inheritance issue, though, we'll say המוציא מחברו עליו הראיה (possession is 9/10s of the law) and he'll be heir to none.
So we have an absolutely modern issue with both moral and financial implications.  There are actually three sources (of which I am aware, anyway; there are likely more).  Each one is worth discussing on its own right, so I'll just give the headlines here.
  1. There is a medrash that says the child who became Yosef HaTzadik was conceived in Leah (so she's the genetic mother) and then transplanted to Rochel (who is now the birth mother).  Leads one to conclude that the genetic mother is the halachic mother (case [1], above).
  2. Masechta Y'vamos (97b) discusses the case of twins born to a woman who converted during her pregnancy; hence the twins were conceived by a goya and birthed by a Jewess.  Leads one to conclude the birth mother is the halachic mother (case [2], above).
  3. Wheat that took root and grew at least 1/3 of its growth before the omer is known as חדש before bringing the korban omer, and ישן afterward.  Suppose a ישן stalk of wheat is uprooted and replanted; is the additional growth also ישן (going by genetic source) or חדש (going by birth source; ie, the ground in which it is planted)?  Chazal leave that issue as unsreolvable and therefore we are lead to case [5], above.
I'll just leave you with one little mind-bender.  Since HaShem is outside of time, all of this that is happening -- including all our modern technology -- was not only known, but was actually already in front of HaShem when the Torah was give.  Just another way to understand the the Torah we have today is just as fresh and relevant today as it was the day we received and accepted it at Har Sinai.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...