Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Finding Comfort in a Time of Tragedy

The word we use for the concept of comforting/consoling mourners in Hebrew is "נחמה".  As is often the case, much is lost in translation.  In this case, the loss is so great as to be nearly false.  Consider the first two uses of that word in the Torah.  First, with the birth of Noach, we are told that he was give than name because "זֶה יְנַחֲמֵנוּ " -- usually translated as: this one will give us rest/respite (B'reishis 5:29).  Only a few verses later, when the Torah notes the evil that is filling the world because of mankind, the Torah tells about HaShem "וַיִּנָּחֶם" --- usually translated as: regretted (B'reishis 6:6).  Neither has much to do with consolation.  Moreover, the concept of HaShem slapping His Forehead in regret is just this side of ludicrous.

Sp what does נחמה mean, anyway?  The most accurate description I have heard is "to alter one's perspective and/or approach".  (Reason number 417 why ArtScroll hasn't hired me: my translations do not flow trippingly off the tongue.)  Noach's birth was going to bring about a new perspective for mankind.  The evil that had developed in the world required a different approach/change of game plan to managing the world.  So to comfort a mourner means to offer him a new or refined perspective.  To be comforted, a mourner needs to see his tragedy in a new light; something that has meaning, instead of a random, vicious attack.  When I had chemotherapy, I understood that the chemicals were curing me; the suffering was bearable because I knew it fit into a bigger picture and it was for the good.  I didn't know how the chemicals really worked; I simply knew that the experts in the field all agreed this was the prescribed cure.  I literally trusted those experts with my life.  [Aside: The pain and suffering of the chemotherapy was not lessened by my knowledge, only made bearable.  The suffering of my young children was actually less bearable, precisely because they really couldn't understand what was happening to their father.]

Chazal -- our sages of blessed memory -- are our experts.  Their analysis of events guides us in our lives.  The gemara at the end of Makkos tells us that four of our greatest sages -- Rabban Gamliel, R' Elazar ben Azarya, R' Y'hoshua, and R' Akiva arrive in Yerushalayim and saw a fox running out of the ruins of the most holy places of the Beis HaMikdash.  Rabban Gamliel, R' Elazar ben Azarya, R' Y'hoshua started crying, but R' Akiva smiled.  The three asked R' Akiva why he was smiling; he replied that they should tell him why they were crying.  They replied with some astonishment: a place of such intense holiness is now so desolate that animals make it their home; how can one not cry?  R' Akiva replied: that is why I am smiling: until I saw the fulfillment of the harsh prophecies, I was afraid that I would not see the fulfillment of the beautiful prophecies; now that I see the one, I have confidence in the other.  The other sages replied, the the gemara ends with: you have comforted us, Akiva, you have comforted us.

It is hard sometimes to believe in the great things that are foretold explicitly and in our medrashic literature about the future.  Can the world really change so much?  There can really be complete peace and harmony?  There can really be the idyllic existence in this world foretold by our prophets?  Go back and read the tochacha/rebuke in Ki Savo and in B'chukosai.  Is there anything that is described that we have not experienced; either first hand or in our history?  And the Torah tells us why: we accepted HaShem's Torah, a prescription for life.  If a person smokes, though, he damages his life and risks lung and heart disease.  If a person strays from the Torah, he damages his eternal life and risks terrible consequences.  Once you see that the doctor is right about the disease, you believe him about the cure.

The mourner doesn't need to understand how the tragedy fits into the big picture nor how it is ultimately for the good; he simply needs to know that there is a bigger picture and that it ultimately is for the good.  That makes the suffering bearable and makes the cure achievable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...