Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: All of Hilchos Shabbos Is Learned from Not Building the Mishkan on Shabbos

Before the ugly affair of the cheit ha'eigel/sin of the golden calf, the Torah instructs us regarding the final details of building the Mishkan/tabernacle.  According to most, the commandment to build the Mishkan came as a response and remedy to that tragic national error.  The building the Mishkan, therefore, was an opportunity to "start over" and rebuild the relationship between HaShem and the Jewish people that had been almost fatally wounded.  As if often the case, the Torah decided to put the instructions for the Mishkan before the the narrative of the cheit ha'eigel.  Perhaps in this case the juxtaposition and order can be understood as a fulfillment of the overarching theme that the r'fu'ah/cure comes before the makah/trauma.

The instructions for building the Mishkan end with a strongly worded admonition that the process of building of the mishkan is in no way to violate Shabbos.
HaShem said to Moshe to say over (the following message): You (Moshe) are to speak ("דבר"; using strong/stern language) to the Jewish people ("בני ישראל"; an expression of intimacy with His nation, as a father to a son), and this is what you are to say: However ("אך"; an exclusion), Guard/Keep My Sabbaths, for it (Shabbos) is sign between you and Me for all your generations to know that it is I, HaShem, Who infuses you with sanctity.  Sh'mos 31:12,13
The message is clear: violation of Shabbos would undermine the entire relationship.  It is the fulfillment of Shabbos that transforms the physical structure of the concrete Mishkan into that spiritual mansion that it represents.  In fact, we learn all of hilchos Shabbos -- that is, precisely which activities are proscribed -- from the building of the mishkan.

The Torah is written on four levels, known by its Hebrew acronym: פרדס; which literally means "orchard", but stands for פשט/simple meaning, רמז/hint, דרש/exposition, and סוד/secret or foundation.  The G"ra would not render פשט until he understood all of the layers of meaning, down to the סוד.  The S'porno explains to us how these few p'sukim/verses explain all there is to know about Shabbos.

First, Shabbos is a sign/symbol of our relationship with our Creator, damage that and there is no spiritual reality for the physical Mishkan to explicate.  Second, on a very dry, halachik level, it doesn't make sense for the fulfillment of a positive commandment (build the Mishkan) to push of the fulfillment of the positive and negative commandment (Shabbos both infuses holiness -- positive, and its desecration is a capital crime -- negative).  Moreover, the violation of Shabbos is much more than simply a capital crime, the violators soul is actually cut off from her Source and her people.  Why?  Because one who violates Shabbos denes that the world was created  -- thereby nullifying his relationship with the Creator and forfeiting his connection to the One True Existence.  Finally, there are six days during which the Mishkan can be constructed, so there is no necessity in violating the Shabbos; the only mitzvos that override Shabbos are those that have a fixed day, such as bris mila (another sign/symbol, by the way).

Philosophy, halacha, exposition, simple meaning... all in those few verses and lived each week from kiddush Friday night to havdalah 25 hours later.  No wonder it's called an orchard; beauty, serenity, and sustenance -- all in a beautiful package.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...