Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: The Laws of the Torah are Entirely Mercy, Kindness, and Peace

The first time I worked on learning through the Mishna Brura, I followed the Mishna Brura Amud  Yomi plan.  One amud (one side of one page) each day and you complete the entire Mishna Brura in five years.  I highly recommend it.  One amud a day is really doable, but there are more doable and less doable days.  When I saw a big Biur Halacha, my eyes would light up and my heart would sing -- it meant I was getting to bed early that night!  I am glad I completed that program, as it gave me a good, basic grounding in halacha l'ma'aseh needed in one's daily activities.

There are, of course, a down side to being held to a schedule.  Excitement that there is less to have to learn is not really a defensible position to the Heavenly Tribunal, after all.  Nor is that the attitude I want to foster in myself, since both gehinom and gan eden is a beis medrash without a clock.  In addition, though, there is just the basic problem of pressure to move on even with a less than complete (read: "no clue what's flying") understanding of topic after topic after topic...  Learning that way is every bit as satisfying as attending a 15 minute wine tasting event for 100s of the finest wines every vinted.  You get a sip of the major categories and hope you retain some memory of  the basics.

I am now going through the Mishna Brura with a different motivation; to gain a clear understanding of both halacha l'ma'aseh, of course; but also to understand the halachic process.  I am now getting a chance to enjoy the appearance, savor the bouquet, taste the complexity, and drink in the beauty of halacha.

Case in point:  the Shulchan Aruch notes (329:4) that one is required to violate Shabbos to save a Jewish life even if the person only has the possibility to live for a short period of time.  The Biur Halacha (d.h. eleh l'fi sha'ah) expounds on that issue.  First, he says, the standard logic of "violate one Shabbos [ie, others on behalf for the person in danger] so that he [ie, the person in danger] may keep many other Shabbosos" just doesn't apply in this case.  The Biur Halacha first quotes a M'eri who explains that Chazal didn't mean just that he would be able to keep Shabbos, but that he would be able to keep many mitzvos.  For example, even someone who has only moments to live can fulfill the mitvah of t'shuva/repentance and confession; even if silently and only to himself.

The Biur Halacha then takes a step back: All this is just to give some logic that we can understand, but in truth the mitvah to save a Jewish life does not depend on his ability to perform mitzvos at all.  Rather, all of the mitzvos themselves exist solely and only for the Jews who will fulfill them.  He then quotes a Rambam (Hilchos Shabbos, Perek 2): The laws of the Torah are not revenge at all; rather they are mercy, kindness, and peace.  I believe the Rambam is directing his remarks to those who think that Torah is telling you what HaShem is going to do to you if you do this or that.  No!  The Torah is telling you the result of doing this or that.  For every action, there is a reaction, and HaShem wants His treasured nation to know very clearly the consequences of every act.  He wants us to know so we can make the best, informed decision possible.  Why?  Because he wants us to live!

Therefore, continues the Biur Halacha, the Torah demands that we desecrate Shabbos for even a mortally wounded new born baby (Rachmana Latlzan) who has never kept mitzvos and now never will; even a brain dead senior who will never wake from his coma.  HaShem wants us to live every moment possible.

A long Biur Halacha still makes my eyes light up; not because it means less to learn, but because it is an opportunity to deepen my appreciation for depth of our Torah and the greatness of our sages.  That is an eminently defensible position and a laudable trait to inculcate.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...