Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Breadth and Boundaries of Rabbinic Decrees

Rabbinic g'zeiros/fences often times seem eminently sensible.  Take muktza, for instance.  (Well, don't actually take it if you happen to have printed this out and are reading on Shabbos.  If you didn't print this out but are reading it on a computer on Shabbos; please stop now.)  If you don't even pick up a hammer (muktza, d'rabbanan), then you won't accidentally whack a nail and finish that bookcase (d'oraisa; yikes!).  In situations where you are allowed to pick up a hammer (you need the place where it is resting, or you need to crack some nuts), you will have already realized that you are in a safety zone and will take appropriate cautions.  That's similar to having guardrail on the walkway at the edge of the Grand Canyon.  (Important Aside: The chance you are taking by of recklessly transgressing a rabbinic decree and risking transgressing a Torah decree -- having eternal repercussions -- is infinitely worse than recklessly ignoring the guardrail -- since even the 700 or so foot drop can only take a finite toll on your infinite life.)

On the other hand, there are rabbinic g'zeiros that seem far-fetched.  The mishna (Terumos 8:4) forbids drinking uncovered beverages because of fear that a snake might have taken a drink and left some venom.  There is also a g'zeira not to blow shofar on a Rosh HaShanah that falls on Shabbos because of the fear that someone might forget himself and carry the shofar in the public domain.  Both of these decrees, however, are actually motivated by a deep concern for the sanctity of life -- our Sages made every effort possible to protect every single Jew.  Both are based on a deep understanding of human nature.  Not an inductive supposition based on empirical evidence and human created models of behavior, rather a deductive understanding based on a deep knowledge of the blueprint from which the human psyche was created -- our Torah.

Even if the reason for a decree may not apply to your particular case, the decree remains in force (as explained here).  For example, even if you live in a community with a kosher eiruv, you will not be blowing shofar on a Shabbos Rosh HaShanah.  On the other hand, if the parameters of the decree simply do not apply, then the decree itself never covered that situation.  For example, nowadays we are permitted to drink beverages that were left uncovered overnight because there simply are no snakes in populated areas (Mishnah Berurah 160:23).  I can't stress enough that this is not a leniency in rabbinic decrees nor deciding on our own that a decree is no longer needed; this is simply the result of a careful analysis of the parameters of the decree.

Now let's look at the g'zeira to not perform any curative or even palliative procedures on Shabbos for minor aches and pains.  The source of the decree comes from a concen that one thing will lead to another and person could be lead to grinding the ingredients necessary to produce a new potion or salve on Shabbos.  Therefore, only medical procedures that involve or could involve grinding herbs are included in the decree.  Why, then, are vigorous massages included?  Because, the Mishna Brura explains, the heating of the muscles can also be achieved with salves; hence, the only process gets put into the purview of the decree.  Snuff, on the other hand -- even though it actually is made from ground tobacco -- is not included because it's main function is to produce a mild high and not to alleviate aches and pains.

Sorry for the extra length... I've been really working on understanding this whole topic and I don't have complete clarity.  I need a cup of coffee.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...