Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: You Are In This World to Change, But It's Your Choice

Finding an intelligent atheist is not as hard as it may seem.  On the one hand, you might think it's a contradiction to be both intelligent and an atheist; something akin to finding someone who doesn't believe in air or viruses because he can't see them.  However, the inclination to want a free lunch (that is, to live a life of "if it feels good, do it") is so powerful that even the most rational mind can turn a blind eye to that incongruity.  When you find one, therefore, you have found a treasure trove of
(See, for example, how atheists tailor make a god whose existence they can deny.)  So when you do find one, you have found a treasure trove of absurdities that is easily mined.

How about this one?  "Well, " the atheist will say with all do pomposity, "religion is a crutch, so you have to admire someone (ie, himself) who doesn't need that crutch."  No, I replied in all innocence, I don't feel at all compelled to admire someone with a broken leg who refuses to use a crutch.  "What!?" eyes bulging in indignation, "You are saying all human beings are handicapped and broken?!?"  At that point I stood and said that yes, I am willing to stand and take an oath that none of us are perfect.  "Oh... uhh... well... sure... I guess that's true..."; hackles down, but brooding.  Somehow it is ok to admit to being less than perfect, but not ok to say that they need to improve.  (Another absurdity; see?  I told you, its like shooting fish in a barrel.)

The first human to express this was none other than the first child born of two human parents: Kayin.  The S'porno fills in details of the oh so brief recounting of Kayin's conversations with his Creator.  Kayin brings and offering of his produce to HaShem.  His brother, Hevel, follows suit (not wanting to be out done by his brother who already is one step ahead), but decides to one-up his brother by bringing his best sheep.  HaShem turned toward Hevel and his offering; but not to Kayin nor to his offering.  Before continuing, let's analyze why Kayin might have brought an inferior offering.  Kayin could have quite reasonably decided that since everything is from HaShem and HaShem doesn't need anything, it is eminently logical to bring the lowest quality grain of his harvest.  Hevel, however, reasoned differently; since everything comes from HaShem and HaShem has no needs, and HaShem will always give him whatever he needs, it is eminently logical to give the best of the flock.

That's what Kayin could have thought.  However, the Torah tells us that Kayin became angry and his face fell.  He was angry with jealousy toward his brother and felt HaShem had shamed him by ignoring his offering.  HaShem asked, in all sincerity, "Why are you jealous of your brother?  Do you not agree that his reasoning is sound and it is fair that I accepted his offering?"  To add even more words, if it were truly a simple difference in the logic, then there is no reason to get angry.  The anger of Kayin reveals that his motives in giving the lower quality were not so pure.  As far as the shame, HaShem had an answer to that as well.  "There is no reason to ever feel embarrassment or shame over doing something wrong.  You see there is a better way, so just put your mind to it and fix things in the future.  All you have to do is try.  I have given you the tools by creating you as a Tzelem Elokim.  That well of Perfection has all you need to perfect yourself and your actions."

Each of us was created imperfect, so of course we make mistakes.  We were, however, also created in the image our Creator.  We have everything we need to become as perfect as we choose.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...