Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Lesson from Iyov -- HaShem Prefers Honest Criticism to Ingratiating Flattery

When I first took college physics, I had wonderful professor: Mr. Work.  (No, really, his name was Lloyd Work; great name for a physics teacher, no?)  I learned a lot from Mr. Work.  I went to his office once to ask some questions, which lead to a more advanced discussion, and he pulled out a quantum mechanics text to elucidate his point.  I looked at the pictures and said I got most of it, but was confused by certain details.  (Not really important for my point here, but I was confused by the meaning of the quantum mechanical electron cloud and how that related to electron shells that I knew from chemistry.)  Mr. Work got a whimsical smile on his face and said, "The only difference between you and me is that I get confused on a higher level than you do, and Feynman (gadol ha'dor in modern physics; died 1988) gets confused at a higher level than I do."  I am not sure if his intent was to humble me or to inspire me, but it did both.  I got a feel for the enormity of my ignorance, but was inspired that I could aspire to whatever I wanted; I just had to be willing to put in the requisite time and effort.  Thank you, Mr. Work.

Throughout Iyov's debate, his manner is passionate, but to the point.  He dismisses their explanations by demonstrating time and time again they the do not stand up to careful scrutiny.  Finally, though, when his friends argue that HaShem's ways are just too deep to understand, Iyov changes tone.  Iyov responded by demonstrating that while they could only talk in generalities about "HaShem's mysterious ways", he (Iyov) could talk with authority on the details of what we know (ma'aseh ha'merkavah) and precisely where the limits of human understanding reach.  Iyov knows full well that he cannot fully understand HaShem and His Ways, but Iyov does expect (and is willing to expend whatever exertion is necessary) to discover an approach that at his level makes sense.  If that would not be true -- if there were absolutely no correlation between one's deeds and the outcome -- then there is no such thing as tzadik and rasha; there is, in fact, no real distinction between good and evil.  Iyov is willing to accept his own confusion, but he is not prepared to accept that reality is nothing but confusion and frustration.  The Wisdom of the Creator it deep beyond all understanding; it absolutely is not, chas v'shalom, random.

At this point, Iyov levels a very sharp criticism of his friends.  They are nothing more than the lowest kind of sycophants!  (Sycophant: a self-seeking, servile flatterer; a fawning parasite.)  They flatter HaShem by saying words that sound pious, but they don't really believe the words they are mouthing.  Their magnum opus?  "Oh... there is no question; it's all good no matter how it feels... la la la... I can't hear you."  Iyov is a great personality; wise, righteous, and pious.  He is willing to go to any length, to suffer and travail.  However, he is not willing to "thrown in the towel" and admit that there are no answers.

Iyov errs in how far he expects to be able to penetrate HaShem's Infinite Wisdom; he doesn't realize that one must ultimately admit his limits and then pray for deeper understanding as a gift from the Creator.  His friends?  Ultimately they simply take the easy road and stop questioning at all.  In doing so they deny themselves an honest relationship with the Creator; which means they deny the ultimate purpose of creation and are dangerously close to denying HaShem Himself, rachmana latzlan.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...