Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Minhag Is for Men (But Not Women) to Light a Personal Candle on Yom Kippur

I had three months of chemotherapy almost 20 years ago.  I got four cycles of three weeks each; each cycle was every day for one week, about six hours each day, then two weeks off.  (The treatments were spread out like that in order to give my body the time it needed to cleanup the resulting dead tumor tissue.)  All the treatments were in the doctor's office, along with a dozen or so other victims.  In the course of my visits over those three months, I saw lots of different chemicals being delivered by various means (mine was all IV, others got pills).  I was never once jealous of the other patients; I never even thought to why this one got a pretty blue pill, while all I got was a clear tube.  That's obviously a silly way to approach the issue.  You don't ask, "Why don't I get such and such a medicine?"; you might ask, though, "Why does get/need such and such a medicine?"

I am similarly surprised when people ask, "Why don't orthodox women do X (that orthodox men do)?"  The only reasonable question is, "Why do orthodox men do that?"  Case in point: The Shulchan Aruch (O.C. 610:4) says there is a well established minhag for all men to light a candle for themselves to burn over Yom Kippur.  This is not a case of "men, ie, people", but "men, ie, not women."  So... why do men light a candle for themselves on Yom Kippur?  I saw three reasons; one for the Magein Avraham, two from the Maharil.  (Thank you again, Dirshu, for saving me all the time of actually finding things myself!)

The Magein Avraham says it is because Yom Kippur was the day of finally really accepting the Torah.  Just to recap, acceptance we supposed to be on Shavuos, then there was that ugly incident with a golden calf 40 days later, then Moshe Rabeinu had to beg for our survival for another 40 days, then yet another 40 days to get the final set of luchos which sealed our acceptance of the Torah and HaShem's acceptance of our (really, really this time) sincere acceptance.  Since Torah is compared to light (Torah ohr v'neir mitzvah, T'hillim) and men are obligated in being involved with Torah lishma/for its own sake, men light candles on that day.

The Maharil works with the gematria (numerical value) of the word neir (candle), which is 250.  Men have 248 eivarim/limbs/organs plus a ru'ach (spirit) and neshama (soul); 248 + 1 + 1 = 250!  Women, apparently have more parts (I have no idea how many more, the Maharil just says more), so the whole candle thing just doesn't work for them.

The other gematria the Maharil brings is that there are 248 positive commandments, plus the concept of "lav ha'nitik l'asei" -- a negative commandment that can be corrected with a positive action; such as stealing that can be corrected by returning the stolen goods, plus the concept of "issur asei" -- a negative that comes from a positive; such as the mitzvah to keep the Shabbos, from which springs many things you can't do.  Again, 248+1+1=250.  This time, since women are not obligated in time bound positive commandments, the whole candle thing just doesn't work for them.

As an aside, I have heard that the 248 positive mitzvos each strengthen one of the 248 eivarim.  I never thought about the fact that women are not obligated in positive time bound mitzvos and have more than 248 eivarim means that whole connection doesn't work for them at all.  That sounds like that could have very, very far reaching consequences.  Hmm....

What do you know... men and women are different!  Son of a gun.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...