Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Immersing Erev Yom Kippur and When a Minhag Doesn't Gets a Bracha

The Shulchan Aruch, OC 606:4 says you are allowed to immerse in a mikvah on erev Yom Kippur any time you want as long as you immerse before sunset and that you shouldn't make a bracha on that immersion.  Being given permission to immerse implies that I was afraid it was forbidden; being told not to make a bracha on said immersion implies that I thought that I should make a bracha.  Now we have four questions:
  1. Why would I think it is forbidden to immerse?
  2. That being the case; why am I allowed to?
  3. Why would I think I should make a bracha on that immersion?
  4. That being the case; why don't I?
The first two questions arise because Shulchan Aruch is starting in the middle of a sentence, as the Mishna Brura explains.  The Shulchan Aruch should have started by mentioning that there is a minhag for everyone -- even unmarried young men and women -- to immerse erev Yom Kippur.  So the answer to question (1) is that usually unmarried men and women do not immerse now a days because we don't have the Beis HaMikdash, which means we don't daven in a place where one must have immersed before entering.  That being the case, going to the mikvah today doesn't allow an unmarried youth anything that would have been otherwise permitted.  Besides that, it lowers the level of issur for an unmarried couple to have relations from d'oraisa to d'rabanan; that being the case, better not to immerse.  So why does the Shulchan Aruch permit it?  Because it is erev Yom Kippur -- people want to do whatever thay can to feel more holy and it is not a day when most people are thinking about how to be sneaky with HaShem's rules of conduct.  So the Shulchan Aruch say, "go ahead, but be careful to immerse well before sunset.

The answer to question (3) is that it the holiness of the day practically demands extra purity and going to the mikvah erev Yom Kippur has become such a well established minhag/custom that to not go is seen as separating oneself from community practice.  Question (4) is now also answered, because it is only a minhag.  (Mishna Brura there, sk 19)

What a minute, says I (here comes my value added): saying Hallel on Rosh Chodesh is also only a minhag, but we say a bracha.  Lighting candles in shul on Chanuka is only a minhag, but we make a bracha.  On the other hand, taking aravos on Hoshana Raba is a minhag and we do not make a bracha.  What gives?

Here's my theory, for what it's worth.  The Rosh says that even with the Beis HaMikdash, there is only an obligation to immerse on erev Yom Kippur when we have the ashes of the red heifer so we can become completely tahor -- even from tumas meis.  However, says the Rosh, if you can't become tahor from all forms of tuma, then there is no obligation to become tahor from any forms of tuma.  That, in turns, means that our immersion on erev Yom Kippur now a days is only a memorial to the immersion that is actually obligated when we have the ashes of the red heifer.  On the other hand, Hallel on Rosh Chodesh and lighting Chanuka candles in the shul are not memorials to anything -- they are what they are; a beautiful and well established custom.

In conclusion, therefore, we see that a minhag that is what it is, gets a bracha.  A minhag that is a memorial to a practice that we cannot do now but hope to soon (may the Beis HaMikdash be rebuilt soon and in our lifetime) does not get a bracha.  That's my story and I'm sticking to it.  Until proven wrong, of course.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...
Post a Comment
Read more