Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Using Distance to Come Closer to HaShem

This is even more self-serving than usual; math!  R' Moshe was once confronted by two parents who wanted to have their son continue on to college instead of beis medrash.  The father was a math professor and a bit of a talmid chacham, so he decided to play his strengths.  The father noted that Chazal tell us that a person is created by three partners: the mother (who contributes the red), the father (who contributes the white), and HaShem (who contributes the soul).  (NB: Before you ask... I have know idea what that means.)  The father further noted that in case of disagreement, we take a vote and follow the majority opinion.  Therefore, concluded the father: "I agree that HaShem wants my son to continue in beis medrash, but his mother and I want him to go to college.  That's ⅔ for college, ⅓ for yeshiva; so the boy should go to college."

I am sure the father had spent hours if not days preparing his arguments.  R' Moshe replied, without missing a beat, that he agreed with the logic of the argument, but that the father had gotten his math wrong.  "You and your wife were also created by three partners.   ⅓ of you, which is 1/9 is HaShem; who, as you say, obviously wants the bochur to continue in yeshiva. Similarly for your wife. That makes the total ⅔ + 2 × 1/9 = 5/9; so the bochur should continue in yeshiva."

Cool, eh?  Of course, R' Moshe had what he needed, so that's the end of the story.  I, however, started thinking... but the grandparents are also a partnership of three, and their parents, and so on and so on back to Adam and Chava.  I'll leave it as an exercise of the interested reader, but the series can be summed exactly.  Basically, for you more interested readers, its and infinite sum minus a remainder term that is essentially (2/3)^(number of generations since Adam & Chava) plus HaShem's initial contribution (no partners!).  For those of you who are less interested, here's the answer: 1; exactly one -- ein od milvado/there is none besides Him.

What about all those parents and parents of parents?  When the contribution from HaShem is added up, one is left only with something that doesn't even fit on the number line; which goes by the name of infinitesimal.  An infinitesimal has no value, it's just smaller than every number (except, of course, zero).  That infinitesimal is what R' Dessler calls the "shadow of a shadow" that was the only thing that separated Adam from his Creator.  Adam had only to recognize that, and we'd all be in Gan Eden now.  Instead, Adam chose to put some additional distance between himself and HaShem in order to be able to return to his King as a ba'al t'shuva.

Adam failed because, though he was very close to HaShem and extremely great, he had no experience with the yeitzer ha'rah/the evil inclination.  We, to our shame, have much experience with the yeitzer ha'rah.  However, that experience has made us better equipped to fight it.  Each generation is a bit further away, but that very distance weakens the yeitzer ha'rah and gives us more experience with fighting him.  We look inside and find Him among the remainder.  Then we look inside the remainder and find Him again.  Then the remainder of the remainder, and so on and so on, till we are back where we were when first created; just an infinitesimal barrier.  Precisely the place we were originally, but this time with lifetimes of experience with being separated and a longing for closeness.

This Tisha b'Av, as we cry and feel more keenly than ever the separation, as we long more fervently than ever for re-unification, we take another step toward the g'ula shleima.  A long journey, to be sure, but one that has an end.  Maybe this year, im yirtzeh HaShem?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...