Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Evolution of the G'zeiros d'Rabanan


I saw a clear proof that evolution based on survival of the fittest is completely false: an idiot riding his bike in traffic, not wearing a helmet, smoking, and talking on his cell phone.  That creature in no way fits the description of "survival of the fittest".  I was going to point this out to my atheist co-workers, but quickly realized that that same creature is also clear proof against intelligent design.  Oh well, I am still unable to illuminate the dark chambers of their strange beliefs in evolution.

Just because evolution applied to the origin of species is false, does not mean that the word has no value.  The word has quite legitimate uses even within our own tradition.  Many g'zeiros d'rabanan underwent an evolution from their initial inception until reaching the final form (sometime before the close of the Babylonian Talmud) that we all know and love today.

Muktza, for example, was originally very much more restrictive than it is now.  N'chemia saw that his generation was being lax in Shabbos observance, so he decreed that basically anything that was not needed for an immediate (and, of course, permissible) use on Shabbos was forbidden to be moved.  Over time, as the decree had its desired effect and Shabbos observance returned to what it should be, the rules were relaxed.  In order to maintain the level of observance several categories of muktza were created, each with its own set of rules.

Another g'zera that has undergone an evolution over the ages is n'tilas yadayim before eating.  This is actually one of the earliest g'zeiros and traces its roots back to Shlomo haMelech.  M'd'oraiso, if a cohein's hands are tamei, then he must wash them before eating t'ruma.  The sages noted that "yadayim askonios hein" -- hands are busy; that is, one's hands often fly around touching and scratching all sorts of stuff and places without the owner paying too much attention.  As a consequence, Chazal gave the hands a "chezkas tuma" -- a presumption of being tamei.  Because of that, Chazal instituted that a cohein should always wash before eating t'ruma; even if he didn't know his hands were tamei.  Since much t'ruma is grain, Chazal later extended the g'zeira to have the cohein wash when eating bread, even if that particular bread was not made from t'ruma.  Finally, since bread meals are more formal and are often eaten in a group setting, Chazal decreed that every Jew should wash before eating bread

So we do believe in evolution.  We just don't believe in foolish and dogmatic adherence to beliefs and theories that are tailor built to allow our yeitzer hara to do whatever it wants.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...