Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Oseik b'Mitzvah Patur Min ha'Mitzvah

I called Rabbi Fuerst a few years ago to ask about giving tzedaka during davening.  My question was motivated by the principle of "oseik b'mitzvah, patur min ha'mitzvah" -- one who is actively busy fulfilling a mitzvah is exempt from another mitzvah.  I was not trying to be stingy about giving tzedaka; chas v'shalom!  That was not even a teensy part of my motivation.  (Hmm.... methinks the gentleman doth protest too much... hmmm).

We usually read "patur" as "you don't have to, but you can if you want to".  That is very often not the case in halacha.  For example, if one is preparing to eat an apple, accidentally says a "sh'hakol" instead of a "borei pri ha'eitz", then takes a bite, he is patur from having to make another bracha because the "sh'hakol" works b'di'avad.  That being the case, the person is actually forbidden from making a "borei pri ha'eitz" on that apple because of the issur of bracha l'vatala.  So in my case, if I would be patur from the mitzvah of giving tzedaka while davening, then it would actually be assur for me to interrupt my davening in order to give said tzedaka.  Which is what motivated my question.  Really.

R' Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, z'tzal, was asking (based on oseik b'mitzvah, patur min ha'mitzvah), why someone in the middle of shmone esrei when the congregation gets to k'dusha needs to stop and silently listen with intent to be yotzei with the responses from the shatz.  He answered (as I understand it) that when one is davening in a congregation, he is already involved with the mitzvah of t'fila b'tzibur, which includes his private shmone esrei.  That being the case, "oseik b'mitzvah, patur min ha'mitzvah" is not really relevant to the situation, because the responses to k'dushah are part and parcel of mitzvah in which you are oseik.  I thought that was a really cool angle on how my private obligation to daven fits in and complements the mitzvah of t'fila b'tzibur.

Regarding my question to R' Fuerst: Apparently he has seen me daven, because he said, "Who says you are really being oseik b'mitzvah?"  (Go for a simple p'sak, get mussar.  That's why you have to have a relationship with your Rav; he's not just a lookup service.)  Bottom line, though, he told me that up through p'sukei d'zimra and after tachanun, I should give tzedaka.  From barchu through tachanun (and during the k'riah of k'rias hatorah), I should really be oseik b'mitzvah and so I shouldn't give then.
Labels:

Comments

jonnydegani said…
I am not sure what your shul is like, but davening the in shteibelach in New Square, it is just as much of an interruption to ignore the guy asking as it is to give. In fact giving usually turns out to be less of an interruption. I found the best thing was to have the money ready so when the guy cam buy I could quickly toss in the coins and go on with davening.
11:28 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: What Category of Muktzeh are Our Candles?

As discussed in a recent TftD , a p'sak halacha quite surprising to many, that one may -- even לכתחילה -- decorate a birthday cake with (unlit, obviously) birthday candles on Shabbos. That p'sak is predicated on another p'sak halacha; namely, that our candles are muktzeh because they are a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not  מוקצה מחמת גופו/intrinsically set aside from any use on Shabbos. They point there was that using the candle as a decoration qualifies as a need that allows one to utilize a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור. Today we will discuss the issue of concluding that our candles are , in fact, a כלי שמלאכתו לאיסור and not מוקצה מחמת גופו. Along the way we'll also (again) how important it is to have personal relationship with your rav/posek, the importance of precision in vocabulary, and how to interpret the Mishna Brura.  Buckle up. After reviewing siman 308 and the Mishna Brura there, I concluded that it should be permissible to use birthday candles to decorate a cake on Sha...
Post a Comment
Read more

Thought for the Day: אוושא מילתא Debases Yours Shabbos

My granddaughter came home with a list the girls and phone numbers in her first grade class.  It was cute because they had made it an arts and crafts project by pasting the list to piece of construction paper cut out to look like an old desk phone and a receiver attached by a pipe cleaner.  I realized, though, that the cuteness was entirely lost on her.  She, of course, has never seen a desk phone with a receiver.  When they pretend to talk on the phone, it is on any relatively flat, rectangular object they find.  (In fact, her 18 month old brother turns every  relatively flat, rectangular object into a phone and walks around babbling into it.  Not much different than the rest of us, except his train of thought is not interrupted by someone else babbling into his ear.) I was reminded of that when my chavrusa (who has children my grandchildrens age) and I were learning about אוושא מילתא.  It came up because of a quote from the Shulchan Aru...
Post a Comment
Read more