Skip to main content

Thought for the Day: Bitul b'Shishim

I have a chavrusa who loves hypotheticals.  When we first met, I think he thought we could be good friends because I also seemed to love hypotheticals.  He eventually learned, however, that his hypothetical was my l'ma'aseh.  That is, I don't really do hypotheticals.  To be honest, I think that realization came in less than or about 60 seconds.  We have been learning for years now, but I think he still reels from time to time by how l'ma'aseh I take nearly every one of his hypotheticals.  A match made in heaven.

So here was the hypothetical d'jour: you are eating steaming hot macaroni and cheese while talking with friends (and probably drinking a beer).  One bite seems "funny".  You look down and see half a meat ball!  What now?

So there are three issues here: the macaroni and cheese, the pot, and the (remaining bit of) meatball.  For argument's sake, we are going to say its a LOT of macaroni and cheese.  In fact, the volume of macaroni and cheese is more than 60 times the volume of the original meatball.  That is, you measure by what was there, not by what is left of the meatball.  So the macaroni and cheese is fine, because of "bitul b'shishim" -- nullified by being less than one part in 60.  "So", my friend asked, "I can eat the macaroni with cheese and the meat ball, since it is all nullified, right?"  No.

How does bitul work?  The real p'shat is that the Torah is only makpid on mixtures of meat and cheese that taste like mixtures of meat and cheese.  The Shulchan Aruch actually says that you can invite a goy who is a chef (so he won't lie, because he has a reputation to maintain) and ask him if he can taste anything meaty about your macaroni and cheese.  I guess at least partly because any real chef would turn up his nose and wacky mac, so the Rema emends the p'sak and says that now a days we rely on our experience that even an expert is not going to taste that small amount of meat flavor in a bit pot of milk (nor vice versa).  That being the case, we see that bitul is not reflexive.  Just because the meat flavor is batul in the macaroni with cheese, the cheese flavor is certainly not batul in the meat ball.  Moreover, since that meat ball is right there in your face, it must be removed and disposed.  The pot is also fine because the macaroni with cheese is fine.  There are some othere really cool sha'eilos on this topic; such as what about if the cheese is not 60 times the meat, but the cheese with the macaroni is 60 times the meat.  The fun just never ends.

Except for the poor guy who ate half the meat ball.  He is now fleishig and has to wait six hours to finish his dinner.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thought for the Day: Pizza, Uncrustables, and Stuff -- What Bracha?

Many years ago (in fact, more than two decades ago), I called R' Fuerst from my desk at work as I sat down to lunch.  I had a piece of (quite delicious) homemade pizza for lunch.  I nearly always eat at my desk as I am working (or writing TftD...), so my lunch at work cannot in any way be considered as sitting down to a formal meal; aka קביעת סעודה.  That being the case, I wasn't sure whether to wash, say ha'motzi, and bentch; or was the pizza downgraded to a m'zonos.  He told if it was a snack, then it's m'zonos; if a meal the ha'motzi.  Which what I have always done since then.  I recently found out how/why that works. The Shulchan Aruch, 168:17 discusses פשטיד''א, which is describes as a baked dough with meat or fish or cheese.  In other words: pizza.  Note: while the dough doesn't not need to be baked together with the meat/fish/cheese, it is  required that they dough was baked with the intention of making this concoction. ...

Thought for the Day: Yetzer HaRa -- Spiritual Force of Tuma vs Physical Ta'avos

In any project planning, there are two basic approaches: top down and bottom up.  Top down starts with describing what you want done at the highest level that seems reasonable.  You then break that down into a list of things that are smaller in scope (they only accomplish part of the job) and are therefore easier to actually accomplish.  That process can is then repeated with each sub-project.  Each iteration produces a new set of smaller projects.  For any of the projects, the level above provides the "why" for the project of interest, and the projects below provide the "how" for the current project.  Bottom up starts, as it's name suggests, from the lowest level -- here is stuff I know I can do, and proceeds by asking "what can I do by putting this stuff together?" For example, I have a project to slake my thirst.  Top down would start by a requirement to get a cool drink into a container from which I can drink.  That breaks down into: (1) fin...

Thought for the Day: Why Halacha Has "b'di'avad"

There was this Jew who knew every "b'di'avad" (aka, "Biddy Eved", the old spinster librarian) in the book.  When ever he was called on something, his reply was invariably, "biddy eved, it's fine".  When he finally left this world and was welcomed to Olam Haba, he was shown to a little, damp closet with a bare 40W bulb hanging from the ceiling.  He couldn't believe his eyes and said in astonishment, "This is Olam Haba!?!"  "Yes, Reb Biddy Eved,  for you this is Olam Haba." b'di'avad gets used like that; f you don't feel like doing something the best way, do it the next (or less) best way.  But Chazal tell us that "kol ha'omer HaShem vatran, m'vater al chayav" -- anyone who thinks HaShem gives partial credit is fooling himself to death (free translation.  Ok, really, really free translation; but its still true).  HaShem created us and this entire reality for one and only one purpose: for use...